1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations

Abstract: Paternity inference using highly polymorphic codominant markers is becoming common in the study of natural populations. However, multiple males are often found to be genetically compatible with each offspring tested, even when the probability of excluding an unrelated male is high. While various methods exist for evaluating the likelihood of paternity of each nonexcluded male, interpreting these likelihoods has hitherto been difficult, and no method takes account of the incomplete sampling and error-prone gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
3,550
3
80

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,779 publications
(3,647 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
14
3,550
3
80
Order By: Relevance
“…We randomly arranged 100 potted plants before flower bud formation in a square 5 × 20 reticular pattern with a distance of 1 m between pots (4 m east–west; 19 m north–south) on a weed‐proof sheet in the experimental fields of Kyushu University in 2012 (Figure 2). These plants were selected to allow assignment of 80% seeds to their fathers under the 95% confidence level from 320 plants genotyped with 10 microsatellite markers using CERVUS v. 3.0.7 (Appendix S1, Genton et al., 2005; Abercrombie et al., 2009; Marshall, Slate, Kruuk, & Pemberton, 1998). We set this percentage of assignment to allow pollination from unknown populations that could be in the vicinity of the experimental population, although the closest known naturalized population was about 7.5 km away.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We randomly arranged 100 potted plants before flower bud formation in a square 5 × 20 reticular pattern with a distance of 1 m between pots (4 m east–west; 19 m north–south) on a weed‐proof sheet in the experimental fields of Kyushu University in 2012 (Figure 2). These plants were selected to allow assignment of 80% seeds to their fathers under the 95% confidence level from 320 plants genotyped with 10 microsatellite markers using CERVUS v. 3.0.7 (Appendix S1, Genton et al., 2005; Abercrombie et al., 2009; Marshall, Slate, Kruuk, & Pemberton, 1998). We set this percentage of assignment to allow pollination from unknown populations that could be in the vicinity of the experimental population, although the closest known naturalized population was about 7.5 km away.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paternity of each seed was determined based on the ∆ statistic (Marshall et al. 1998), defined as the difference between the “LOD score” of the first most likely father candidate and the “LOD score” of the second most likely candidate. Significance was determined with the paternity tests simulated by Cervus program.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paternal half‐siblings were determined genetically through an independent paternity analysis using the software cervus 3.0 (Marshall et al. 1998; Kalinowski et al. 2007) (see Supporting Information and Table S5 for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%