Geo-China 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1061/9780784480007.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Correlations between Pressuremeter Tests and SPT for Glacial Tills

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the native clayey silt till was approximated by the elastic perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb material model. The empirical correlation proposed by Balachandran et al (2015) to estimate the elastic modulus (E s ) of clayey silt till using SPT-N values, i.e., E s = 1.67N, was employed for both the very stiff D r a f t P.10 and hard till layers, resulting in E s values of 43 MPa and 90 MPa, respectively. The Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters (angle of internal friction,  , and cohesion, c) were adopted from the ranges provided by Cao et al (2015) for silty clay and clayey silt tills;  ranges between 31 and 41, and c ranges between 0 and 50 kPa.…”
Section: Native and Backfill Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of the native clayey silt till was approximated by the elastic perfectly plastic Mohr-Coulomb material model. The empirical correlation proposed by Balachandran et al (2015) to estimate the elastic modulus (E s ) of clayey silt till using SPT-N values, i.e., E s = 1.67N, was employed for both the very stiff D r a f t P.10 and hard till layers, resulting in E s values of 43 MPa and 90 MPa, respectively. The Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters (angle of internal friction,  , and cohesion, c) were adopted from the ranges provided by Cao et al (2015) for silty clay and clayey silt tills;  ranges between 31 and 41, and c ranges between 0 and 50 kPa.…”
Section: Native and Backfill Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies correlating the corrected SPT values and different geotechnical properties of soil such density, undrained shear strength, shear wave velocity, and liquefaction potential, but the results of these correlations are still considered preliminary and cannot be used for detailed design of foundations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Additionally, the correlation between the results of SPTs with some promising field techniques such as pressuremeter test (PMT) and cone penetration test (CPT) using statistical analysis have been presented, which gives support for the results of SPT by newly developed techniques [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agan [19] investigated the relationship between PMT, SPT and laboratory test data for silty sands of a region, Kastamonu, Turkey. Balachandran and Liu [20] presented correlations between EPMT and SPT-N value of glacial tills. Narimani et al [21] developed simple and nonlinear regression models to correlate SPT, compression and pressuremeter test data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%