2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Decision Methods in Hidden Information Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the WS detector was rederived [26] using invariant hypothesis testing by adopting a parametric model for the cover. An Asymptotically Universally Most Powerful (AUMP) test that seems to coincide with a generalized likelihood ratio was derived in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the WS detector was rederived [26] using invariant hypothesis testing by adopting a parametric model for the cover. An Asymptotically Universally Most Powerful (AUMP) test that seems to coincide with a generalized likelihood ratio was derived in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recently shown [6,8], the WS implicitly assumes that the quantization step is negligible. Let us rewrite the LR test for JSteg detection based on a Gaussian distribution model of DCT coefficients.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the LSB-replacement steganalysis method (see [5][6][7][8][9][10]) has been studied for many years, it can be noted that most of the prior-art detectors are designed to detect data hidden in the spatial domain. In addition, for only a few detectors, the statistical properties have been studied and established, referred to as the optimal detectors.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations