2008
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical evaluation of differences in phytoplankton richness and abundance as constrained by environmental drivers in transitional waters of the Mediterranean basin

Abstract: ABSTRACT1. This paper is focused on the identification of patterns of variation in phytoplankton abundance and taxonomic composition at the eco-regional scale. In addition, these patterns were evaluated with respect to climatic, hydrological and physiographic drivers.2. A hierarchical sampling design was used to integrate seasonal and spatial variations in taxonomic richness, abundance and taxonomic composition of phytoplankton guilds. Data were collected synoptically during two seasons (autumn and spring) in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phytoplankton communities are in fact, the first to suffer the effect and/or to draw any benefits from periods characterized by high presence of nutrients; the high trophy, detected especially in some periods, feeds phytoplankton growth with likely positive effects even for upper trophic rings [22,23]. Moreover, it is necessary to highlight that phytoplankton biodiversity and dynamoics in transitional waters are controlled by different factors, such as flushing rate, residence time, depth, salinity, light and nutrient concentrations; the relevance of each of these factors to the dynamics of phytoplankton guilds is modulated by specific geo-and hydrodynamic properties of each singular transitional system, which determine the differentiation of phytoplankton assemblages [24]. Climatic variations affect phytoplankton directly by eliciting physiological and adaptive responses, and indirectly by inducing hydrological and biological changes, which influence both bottom-up and top-down processes involving phytoplankton variability [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplankton communities are in fact, the first to suffer the effect and/or to draw any benefits from periods characterized by high presence of nutrients; the high trophy, detected especially in some periods, feeds phytoplankton growth with likely positive effects even for upper trophic rings [22,23]. Moreover, it is necessary to highlight that phytoplankton biodiversity and dynamoics in transitional waters are controlled by different factors, such as flushing rate, residence time, depth, salinity, light and nutrient concentrations; the relevance of each of these factors to the dynamics of phytoplankton guilds is modulated by specific geo-and hydrodynamic properties of each singular transitional system, which determine the differentiation of phytoplankton assemblages [24]. Climatic variations affect phytoplankton directly by eliciting physiological and adaptive responses, and indirectly by inducing hydrological and biological changes, which influence both bottom-up and top-down processes involving phytoplankton variability [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is true that in these two lagoons, phytoplankton is not the main primary producer, but macroalgae component is also very important. In general, it is necessary to highlight that phytoplankton biodiversity and dynamics in transitional waters are controlled by different factors, such as flushing rate, residence time, depth, salinity, light and nutrient concentrations; the relevance of each of these factors to the dynamics of phytoplankton guilds is modulated by specific geo-and hydrodynamic properties of each singular transitional system, which determine the differentiation of phytoplankton assemblages (Vadrucci et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hierarchical sampling design (see Vadrucci et al, 2008) was adopted to investigate the seasonal and spatial variation of macroinvertebrate community structure. Data were collected during autumn 2004 and spring 2005, at two sampling points for each habitat type in each ecosystem (TWReferenceNET 'Technical Report on the Biotic Indices of Natural Heritage Safety in Transitional Waters' www.twreferencenet.com/ Products section).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%