2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical evaluation of fatigue strength of double shear riveted connections and crack growth rates of materials from old bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical procedure n this paper, the statistical procedure to determine the design curves for the experimental fatigue crack propagation data used was proposed by Gallegos Mayorga et al [2]. This procedure follows the same recommendations that were proposed by ASTM E739-91 standard [22].…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Experimental Fatigue Crack Propagamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical procedure n this paper, the statistical procedure to determine the design curves for the experimental fatigue crack propagation data used was proposed by Gallegos Mayorga et al [2]. This procedure follows the same recommendations that were proposed by ASTM E739-91 standard [22].…”
Section: Statistical Evaluation Of Experimental Fatigue Crack Propagamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental fatigue crack growth data from the old riveted metallic bridges are collected for the statistical analysis proposed by Gallegos Mayorca et al [2] aiming at obtaining the design curves for these materials. The experimental fatigue crack propagation data was derived accordingly ASTM E647 standard procedures [25].…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(8) corresponds to the accumulative plastic strain increment (10) In order to accurately describe the nonlinearity of stress-strain loops, a significant improvement on the Armstrong-Frederick model [61] was given by Chaboche and Rousselier [60] by dividing the deviatoric part of back stress tensor into M independent parts as (11) whereas evolution of each kinematic part is expressed according to [61] …”
Section: Cyclic Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the specimen after shot blasting exhibits a notable increase in the fatigue strength, which can be classified as FAT 160. To better the diagrammatic presentation and comparison, the linearized boundaries method outlined by Reference [14] was introduced, as shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen that a single slope represented by this method can be useful in the correlation with the test data, justifying the necessity of a global and simplified approach.…”
Section: Stress Range Versus Fatigue Life (S-n) Relation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%