2016
DOI: 10.21660/2016.21.5398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Evaluation of Geotechnical Correlations

Abstract: Geotechnical correlations are widely used because it can provide fast and cost-effective means of parameter estimation using simple tests. Most of the current correlations were derived from data fitting of measurements for specific site conditions and need to be evaluated before used in other sites. During the correlation development, the deviation of the correlation from the measured values was evaluated using simple statistical measures. A better method of correlation evaluation may reduce the overall deviat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has examined more than 130 undisturbed specimens obtained from different depths which are results of two years geotechnical studies located at south-west of Iran. Habibbeygi and Nikraz [15] obtained a new CC formula for remolded clay, namely Cc = 0,666eL -0,830e p ; Daoud, Kasama, Saleh, Negm [16] declared the best correlation for Cc is 0,2608e and Cc = 0,0093Wc, and Sari and Firmansyah [17] also obtained a new Cc formula, namely Cc = 0.6787eo-0.1933 obtained from 466 soil samples from 77 points of data bore holes at 25 locations spread in Surabaya area. Those empirical formulations were not used in this study because the data used is only valid for the local area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has examined more than 130 undisturbed specimens obtained from different depths which are results of two years geotechnical studies located at south-west of Iran. Habibbeygi and Nikraz [15] obtained a new CC formula for remolded clay, namely Cc = 0,666eL -0,830e p ; Daoud, Kasama, Saleh, Negm [16] declared the best correlation for Cc is 0,2608e and Cc = 0,0093Wc, and Sari and Firmansyah [17] also obtained a new Cc formula, namely Cc = 0.6787eo-0.1933 obtained from 466 soil samples from 77 points of data bore holes at 25 locations spread in Surabaya area. Those empirical formulations were not used in this study because the data used is only valid for the local area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%