2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1451-7_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Features-Based Violence Detection in Surveillance Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Datasets: The Hockey Fight [23] and Movies Dataset [24] are adopted for training and evaluating the proposed AMCNN. The Hockey Fight includes 1000 video clips, which consist of an equal number of violent and non-violent behaviors.…”
Section: Datasets and Experiments Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets: The Hockey Fight [23] and Movies Dataset [24] are adopted for training and evaluating the proposed AMCNN. The Hockey Fight includes 1000 video clips, which consist of an equal number of violent and non-violent behaviors.…”
Section: Datasets and Experiments Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], a new deep NeuralNet approach has been presented for the task of Violence Detection by extraction of motion features in RGB Dynamic Images (DI). Deepak et al [30] introduce a novel statistical feature descriptor for detecting violent human actions in real-time surveillance videos. Ehsan et al [31] presented a novel Vi-Net structure dependent upon the deep CNN for detecting activities with abnormal velocity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification is then done using a machine learning classifier that has been trained. Deepak et al [15] detect and distinguish aggressive actions in crowded scenes. To extract motion information from video frames, Spatio-temporal autocorrelation of gradient was used as a feature extraction method.…”
Section: Handcrafted Based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various classifiers have been employed in both supervised and unsupervised settings. According to the papers reviewed, SVM was the most widely used supervised classifier [15] [29] [30], whereas CNN was the most widely used unsupervised classifier [31] [22] [24]. Anomaly representation has been applied in both categories using distinct features.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation