2000
DOI: 10.1109/20.908691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical fluctuations during magnetization reversal in Fe films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
10
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous experimental work on 2D systems has produced different values, ranging from being ϳ1.5, 14 to ϳ1.1. 15 Our results are close to the lower of the two, although the authors offer no explanation as to the physical meaning of their value, so it is difficult to know whether the causes are the same in each case.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous experimental work on 2D systems has produced different values, ranging from being ϳ1.5, 14 to ϳ1.1. 15 Our results are close to the lower of the two, although the authors offer no explanation as to the physical meaning of their value, so it is difficult to know whether the causes are the same in each case.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, comparatively little work has been done with twodimensional samples, as a pickup coil receives a greatly decreased signal, making it difficult to resolve against background noise. Accordingly, although the inductive method has been employed in this area successfully by one group, 14 most experiments in this area have been based on different techniques, such as MOKE 15,16 and MFM. 17 With the exception of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ferromagnetic thin films, very important for nanostructured magnetic devices, the interpretation of the statistical properties is not so well established, due to several theoretical and experimental difficulties, even considering the recent relevant reports found in literature [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. On the theoretical side, the complexity of the magnetic domains and variety of DWs in films make the complete description of the system and the analysis of the dynamics a hard task [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these reports found in literature based on magneto-optical measurements [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52], although they restrict the analysis to distributions of jump sizes, when compared to theoretical predictions, most of them does confirm an essentially two-dimensional magnetic behavior for films, as expected due to reduced thickness of the studied samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, several interesting results have been obtained for different ferromagnetic films through both magneto-optical [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] and inductive [6,8,53] [44], both results obtained through measurements performed using a magneto-optical elipsometer. D.-H. Kim et al [45] have presented τ ∼ 1.33 for Co polycrystalline films, with thicknesses varying from 5 to 50 nm, and S.-C. Shin et al [46] have found τ ∼ 1.33 for Co and MnAs films, with the same thicknesses, by measurements using a magneto-optical microscope magnetometer, capable of observing directly the motion of the DWs and the Barkhausen avalanches [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%