2015
DOI: 10.5194/cp-11-425-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations by use of climate proxy data from the last millennium – Part 3: Practical considerations, relaxed assumptions, and using tree-ring data to address the amplitude of solar forcing

Abstract: Abstract.A statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations by comparison with climate observations from instrumental and proxy data (part 1 in this series) is improved by the relaxation of two assumptions. This allows autocorrelation in the statistical model for simulated internal climate variability and enables direct comparison of two alternative forced simulations to test whether one fits the observations significantly better than the other. The extended framework is applied to a set of si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the spatio-temporal structure of the temperature changes is complex, with warm and cold periods being generally not synchronous between different regions (PAGES 2k Consortium, 2013). Those conclusions are in overall agreement with the results derived from global climate models driven by estimates of natural and anthropogenic forcings, although mod-H. Goosse et al: Simulated Alpine glacier length over the past millennium els tend to underestimate the magnitude of the changes in some regions and to simulate more homogenous changes than in the reconstructions (Goosse et al, 2005;Raibble et al, 2006;Gonzalez-Rouco et al, 2006;Jungclaus et al, 2010;Fernández-Donado et al, 2013;Landrum et al, 2013;Neukom et al, 2014;Moberg et al, 2015;PAGES2k-PMIP, 2015;Otto-Bliesner et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nevertheless, the spatio-temporal structure of the temperature changes is complex, with warm and cold periods being generally not synchronous between different regions (PAGES 2k Consortium, 2013). Those conclusions are in overall agreement with the results derived from global climate models driven by estimates of natural and anthropogenic forcings, although mod-H. Goosse et al: Simulated Alpine glacier length over the past millennium els tend to underestimate the magnitude of the changes in some regions and to simulate more homogenous changes than in the reconstructions (Goosse et al, 2005;Raibble et al, 2006;Gonzalez-Rouco et al, 2006;Jungclaus et al, 2010;Fernández-Donado et al, 2013;Landrum et al, 2013;Neukom et al, 2014;Moberg et al, 2015;PAGES2k-PMIP, 2015;Otto-Bliesner et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…mostly pre-PMIP3) or low (PMIP3) estimates of solar variations, several studies have investigated which of these provide a better fit to temperature reconstructions, but the results have so far been mixed. Whereas simulations with larger TSI variability give a somewhat better representation of the size of the MCA-LIA transition for Northern Hemisphere temperatures (Fernández-Donado et al, 2013), statistical assessment (Hind and Moberg, 2013;Moberg et al, 2015;PAGES2k-PMIP3 group, 2015) and more detailed regional analyses (e.g. Luterbacher et al, 2016) were inconclusive.…”
Section: Drivers Of Climate Variations During the Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collaborative work has focused on reconstruction-model intercomparison (e.g. Bothe et al, 2013;Moberg et al, 2015;PAGES2k-PMIP3 Group, 2015) and assessment of modes of variability (e.g. Raible et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue may be addressed by analysing an ensemble of simulations, which provides information on the range that can be simulated by one single model (e.g. Goosse et al, 2005;Yoshimori et al, 2005;Jungclaus et al, 2010;Moberg et al, 2015) or a set of models (e.g. Jansen et al, 2007;Lehner et al, 2012;Fernández-Donado et al, 2013, Bothe et al, 2013b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%