We consider a simultaneous small noise limit for a singularly perturbed coupled diffusion described bywhere Bt, Wt are independent Brownian motions on R d and R m respectively, b :. We impose regularity assumptions on b, U and let 0 < α < 1. When s(ε) goes to zero slower than a prescribed rate as ε → 0, we characterize all weak limit points of X ε , as ε → 0, as solutions to a differential equation driven by a measurable vector field. Under an additional assumption on the behaviour of U (x, ·) at its global minima we characterize all limit points as Filippov solutions to the differential equation.Laplace's principle. Consequently, for this class of U , we show that every limit point is a generalized Filippov solution to (3) driven by a vector field (see Theorem 1.6). In Section 1.1 we state the model, assumptions made, and the two results precisely and in Section 1.2 we discuss examples of U that satisfy the required assumptions.The factor 1 ε in the drift term in (2), intuitively suggests that the Y ε process is the "fast moving" process as ε → 0 and that the "slow moving" process X ε will see an averaging of Y in this limit. The study of averaging principle in various dynamical systems dates back to the work of Khasminskii and others, summarized in, e.g., Freidlin and Wentzell [FW12], Kabanov and Pergamenshchikov [KP03]. The dynamical systems considered there involve a "slow process" X ε as a solution to an ordinary differential equation (i.e. (1) with no B t term) coupled with the fast process Y ε given by a stochastic differential equation with absence of small noise (i.e. (2) with s(ε) = 1). In this setting, under further assumptions on b, U , the averaging principle leading to characterization of limit points, normal deviations, and large deviations from the averaging principle are detailed in [FW12, Chapter 7]. The ground work for this lies in understanding the long-term behavior of solutions to (2) (for fixed ε > 0), and is laid out in [FW12, Chapters 4-6]. We shall rely on this foundation in prescribing assumptions for U in our main results.Large deviations and generalizations to "full dependence" systems were considered in the works of Veretennikov in [Ver13,Ver94,Ver99]. Motivated by questions from homogenization, [Ver00] considered the fast process (2) with s(ε) = 1 but with presence of small noise for the slow process (i.e. (1) with α = 1 2 ) and established a large deviation principle (LDP) for X ε as ε → 0. One can characterize the limit points of X ε as ε → 0 as the set where the rate function is equal to zero (see [Ver00, Remark 3]). In [Lip96], Liptser considered the joint distribution of the slow process and of the empirical process associated with the fast variable in the one-dimensional setting and derived an LDP. This was recently generalized to multidimensional and full dependence systems by Puhalskii in [Puh16]. The diffusions driving the slow and the fast processes in [Puh16] do not have to be uncorrelated.