2006
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2006.872433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical instability of the ramp discharge and the role of exoemission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several different types of priming species have been cited, including space charges and metastables from preceding discharge cycles 2,3 and exo-electron emissions from MgO. [3][4][5][6][7] The decay time for the space charge by recombination reactions was estimated to be less than 50 µsec 8 and the decay time for the metastable Xe* 2 dimer through the conversion reaction to Xe* was estimated to be less than 100 µsec. 5 However, the conventional address-display separated (ADS) driving method of ACPDPs uses sub-fields for which the time frame is longer than 1 msec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several different types of priming species have been cited, including space charges and metastables from preceding discharge cycles 2,3 and exo-electron emissions from MgO. [3][4][5][6][7] The decay time for the space charge by recombination reactions was estimated to be less than 50 µsec 8 and the decay time for the metastable Xe* 2 dimer through the conversion reaction to Xe* was estimated to be less than 100 µsec. 5 However, the conventional address-display separated (ADS) driving method of ACPDPs uses sub-fields for which the time frame is longer than 1 msec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] The decay time for the space charge by recombination reactions was estimated to be less than 50 µsec 8 and the decay time for the metastable Xe* 2 dimer through the conversion reaction to Xe* was estimated to be less than 100 µsec. 5 However, the conventional address-display separated (ADS) driving method of ACPDPs uses sub-fields for which the time frame is longer than 1 msec. Thus, this short decay time of the space charge and metastables makes such sources unsuitable as priming sources for discharge cells kept OFF at the preceding sub-fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result of recent advancements, plasma displays have become high-definition (HD), and thus the addressing time has become a critical issue. 1 A novel ACPDP having a shadow-mask (SMPDP) with an effective structure with lower cost and lower driving voltage is presented. [2][3][4] The distinct difference between SMPDP and a conventional ACPDP is that the dielectric barrier ribs are replaced by a single metal shadow mask.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glow discharge can cause misaddressing, decrease the contrast ratio and the voltage margin, and limit the choice of PDP drive waveform. The cause of glow discharge in the set-up period may be related to either surface morphology or to secondary electron emission by the phosphor [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%