2015
DOI: 10.1890/15-0142.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical integration of tracking and vessel survey data to incorporate life history differences in habitat models

Abstract: Habitat use is often examined at a species or population level, but patterns likely differ within a species, as a function of the sex, breeding colony, and current breeding status of individuals. Hence, within-species differences should be considered in habitat models when analyzing and predicting species distributions, such as predicted responses to expected climate change scenarios. Also, species' distribution data obtained by different methods (vessel-survey and individual tracking) are often analyzed separ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Yamamoto et al . ). Running SDMs in a predictive mode allows for habitat estimates at finer temporal scales (days to months) limited by environmental data availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…; Yamamoto et al . ). Running SDMs in a predictive mode allows for habitat estimates at finer temporal scales (days to months) limited by environmental data availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Yamamoto et al . ). These two approaches provide complementary data; however, telemetry data are generally underutilized in management because the data are presence‐only, violate statistical assumptions including independence of observations (Maunder et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Telemetry‐based models may therefore underestimate offshore habitat suitability, though model performance remained high when compared to sightings data that were more broadly distributed offshore (Figure ). Testing the performance of models developed using a combination of data types such as telemetry, transect survey and acoustic monitoring data would therefore be a valuable exercise for exploring biases based on data types used (Fithian, Elith, Hastie, & Keith, ; Yamamoto et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to combine Eulerian and Lagrangian perspectives using seabird counts within quantitative models have been conducted (Hyrenbach, Keiper, Allen, Ainley, & Anderson, 2006;Louzao et al, 2009;Yamamoto et al, 2015), and methods continue to be refined (Watanuki et al, 2016). Development of separate habitat models using data from each sampling perspective, and then comparing and integrating results across models, presents a powerful tool to quantify factors influencing marine mammal and seabird distributions and habitat use (Watanuki et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%