2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Learning Impairments as a Consequence of Stroke

Abstract: Statistical learning is the implicit learning of the contingencies between sequential stimuli, typically from mere exposure. It is present from infancy onward, and plays a role in functions from language learning to selective attention. Despite these observations, there are few data on whether statistical learning capacity changes with age or after brain injury. In order to examine how brain injury affects the ability to learn and update statistical representations, we had young control and healthy elder parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have shown that oxidative damage could cause neuronal cells death, leading to PSCI (38,39), which may explain our conclusion. Previous studies have reported that age may be an independent risk factor for PSCI (40)(41)(42). In our study, the univariate analysis results showed age was a possible risk factor for PSCI, but the multivariate logistic regression analysis results suggested no significant association between age and PSCI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Some studies have shown that oxidative damage could cause neuronal cells death, leading to PSCI (38,39), which may explain our conclusion. Previous studies have reported that age may be an independent risk factor for PSCI (40)(41)(42). In our study, the univariate analysis results showed age was a possible risk factor for PSCI, but the multivariate logistic regression analysis results suggested no significant association between age and PSCI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…For this experiment, two syllabaries (syllabary A and syllabary B) with 16 unique auditory CV syllables each (e.g., “tu,” “ci,” “da,” “mi,” “ge,” “do’ from syllabary A; and “ga,” “pa,” “be,” “me,” “gu,” “pi” from syllabary B) were created to generate the nonsense words to be used in the implicit and explicit versions of the SL task. Note that, because we used a within-subject design, using syllables coming from two different artificial languages (i.e., without any syllable overlap, although vowels were necessarily repeated across syllabaries) was mandatory to minimize interference effects of the first language over the second language, as observed in other studies (e.g., Gebhart et al, 2009 ; Franco et al, 2011 ; Shaqiri et al, 2018 ). Syllables were produced and recorded by a native speaker of European Portuguese with a duration of 300 ms each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 Our findings may thus be consistent with a previous report of impairments in auditory SL in a cohort of patients with multilobar brain damage from stroke. 36 In addition, patients with uncontrolled seizures had seizure types that were predominantly (90%) bilateral tonic-clonic or focal impaired-awareness (Table S4), potentially indicating more pronounced global dysfunction. Although there have been conflicting results on the relationship between seizure frequency and declarative memory, [37][38][39][40] we did not find the same relationship between seizure control and EM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%