2004
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.70.066610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical mechanics of general discrete nonlinear Schrödinger models: Localization transition and its relevance for Klein-Gordon lattices

Abstract: We extend earlier work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3740 (2000)]] on the statistical mechanics of the cubic one-dimensional discrete nonlinear Schrödinger (DNLS) equation to a more general class of models, including higher dimensionalities and nonlinearities of arbitrary degree. These extensions are physically motivated by the desire to describe situations with an excitation threshold for creation of localized excitations, as well as by recent work suggesting noncubic DNLS models to describe Bose-Einstein condensates… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we discussed above, the condition (39) leads to condensation; the rest of L − 1 random variables behave as if they were mutually independent and distributed with w(v; r) [15,16]. In other words, the distribution of background fluid that co-exists with the condensate is given by the grand canonical distribution with maximal fugacity.…”
Section: Condensed Phasementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we discussed above, the condition (39) leads to condensation; the rest of L − 1 random variables behave as if they were mutually independent and distributed with w(v; r) [15,16]. In other words, the distribution of background fluid that co-exists with the condensate is given by the grand canonical distribution with maximal fugacity.…”
Section: Condensed Phasementioning
confidence: 94%
“…It now remains to estimate δ( (39). As we discussed above, the condition (39) leads to condensation; the rest of L − 1 random variables behave as if they were mutually independent and distributed with w(v; r) [15,16].…”
Section: Condensed Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At variance to its space-continuous counterparts, the disorder-free translationally invariant lattice model with ε l = 0 shows a non-Gibbsean phase [7,8]. It is separated from the Gibbsean phase by states of infinite temperature.…”
Section: Gibbsean and Nongibbsean Regimesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is separated from the Gibbsean phase by states of infinite temperature. While average densities in the non-Gibbsean phase can be formally described by Gibbs distributions with negative temperature, in truth the dynamics shows a separation of the complex field ψ l into a two-component one -a first component of high density localized spots and a second component of delocalized wave excitations with infinite temperature [7,8,9,10,11]. The high density localized spots are conceptually very similar to selftrapping and discrete breathers [12].…”
Section: Gibbsean and Nongibbsean Regimesmentioning
confidence: 97%