Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives/Scope The objective of this work is to present a first step towards a hybrid approach between machine learning (ML) and physics-based modelling to provide decision support for drilling problems. The motivation for developing a hybrid approach is to obtain methods that are more reliable and easier to automate than physics-based models, while still have enough accuracy and predictivity. In this first step, we replicate the performance for predicting downhole pressure in a well of a high-fidelity simulator based upon physical principles by using ML methods. In addition, we also suggest a future roadmap. Methods, Procedures, Process A high-fidelity physics-based model for drilling and well control operations is used to generate vast amounts of data for two cases, drilling with not major events, and drilling into an over-pressured reservoir. Key simulation input parameters and assumptions are varied to create realistic scenarios. We replicate the high-fidelity simulator downhole pressure predictions by two supervised machine learning algorithms. Random forest (RF) and recurrent neural network (RNN). The hybrid approach is flexible and is also employed for kick detection and estimation of the mass of the influx. After using unaltered data from the high-fidelity simulator, we also demonstrate the ML methods on corrupted data with synthetic noise. Results, Observations, Conclusions RF and RNN obtained very high accuracy, predicting bottom hole pressure with small error margin. Good results were also obtained for the kick estimation and kick detection cases. Tested on corrupted data, RF trained with noise performed significantly better compared to RF trained without noise, at the cost of a slight reduction in accuracy in the error free scenario. Initials tests on real data are ongoing and further work is needed. Hybrid methods have the potential of performing well with noisy environments and are valuable tool to be used in drilling automation. Novel/Additive Information Combining highly advanced dynamic models for drilling and well control with modern ML methods has not been done earlier to the best knowledge of the authors. Demonstrating this on real data will be valuable because data-driven and physics-based approaches used separately are considered inadequate for future automated drilling concepts.
Objectives/Scope The objective of this work is to present a first step towards a hybrid approach between machine learning (ML) and physics-based modelling to provide decision support for drilling problems. The motivation for developing a hybrid approach is to obtain methods that are more reliable and easier to automate than physics-based models, while still have enough accuracy and predictivity. In this first step, we replicate the performance for predicting downhole pressure in a well of a high-fidelity simulator based upon physical principles by using ML methods. In addition, we also suggest a future roadmap. Methods, Procedures, Process A high-fidelity physics-based model for drilling and well control operations is used to generate vast amounts of data for two cases, drilling with not major events, and drilling into an over-pressured reservoir. Key simulation input parameters and assumptions are varied to create realistic scenarios. We replicate the high-fidelity simulator downhole pressure predictions by two supervised machine learning algorithms. Random forest (RF) and recurrent neural network (RNN). The hybrid approach is flexible and is also employed for kick detection and estimation of the mass of the influx. After using unaltered data from the high-fidelity simulator, we also demonstrate the ML methods on corrupted data with synthetic noise. Results, Observations, Conclusions RF and RNN obtained very high accuracy, predicting bottom hole pressure with small error margin. Good results were also obtained for the kick estimation and kick detection cases. Tested on corrupted data, RF trained with noise performed significantly better compared to RF trained without noise, at the cost of a slight reduction in accuracy in the error free scenario. Initials tests on real data are ongoing and further work is needed. Hybrid methods have the potential of performing well with noisy environments and are valuable tool to be used in drilling automation. Novel/Additive Information Combining highly advanced dynamic models for drilling and well control with modern ML methods has not been done earlier to the best knowledge of the authors. Demonstrating this on real data will be valuable because data-driven and physics-based approaches used separately are considered inadequate for future automated drilling concepts.
Objectives/Scope The paper describes what steps have been taken towards improved monitoring and control of the offshore drilling fluid process. These steps include the following: Methods, Procedures, Process The predictive viscosity model tracks the active fluids, calculates additives concentrations in the flow loop, analyses sensor data, calibrates viscosity response to additives, and estimates what is needed to obtain the set target rheology. Laboratory and full-scale tests both onshore and offshore have been performed using the automated rheology and density sensor. To prepare for automating the drilling fluid conditioning process, the predictive rheology model was integrated with the drilling fluid control system and sensor data. Additionally, integration with database and cloud service was implemented to facilitate transfer of data from the rig to the onshore. Results, Observations, Conclusions During laboratory scale experiments, the predictive rheology model represented topology flexibly and was configured to represent the active flow loops in laboratory scale experiments, full scale onshore test, and offshore test with two sensors in the loop. The data processing algorithm with data quality assessment and model calibration was tested with onshore full-scale data. Many challenges were addressed and solved by cooperating partners in the integrated fluid laboratory, which included two sensors, the predictive rheology model, drilling fluid control system and a flow loop with multiple active tanks and mixing lines with dosing units for adding liquids and powders. The first response tests for the calculated additive rate set-point were successfully performed. Full-scale onshore tests were completed while adding different additives and recording the rheology data. The calibrated predictive model showed good correlation with the recorded data. Temperature effects were also considered and modelled accurately. Two sensors were installed offshore, recording data during regular drilling operations. Novel/Additive Information New elements required to automate the drilling fluid treatment process have been implemented and tested, including a predictive rheology model and data integration between different vendor's software/control systems and equipment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.