2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42107-020-00221-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods applied to construction process management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although traditional methods have some limitations for site monitoring, such as time-consuming, operose, missing or incomplete information, resulting in a slow flow of information, make effective decision-making difficult, labor-intensive and high expenses (Kimoto et al , 2005; Luo et al , 2018; Naoum, 2015; Omar et al , 2018; Yang et al , 2015), they have been used in several studies to monitor the productivity of different indoor activities (such as tiling, plastering, masonry work, false ceiling boarding and fixing and application of screed) and outdoor activities (such as formwork, reinforcement steel activities, MEP, concrete work and curtain wall) (Alchaer and Issa, 2020; Azhar et al , 2020; Bhatti et al , 2019; Chui et al , 2012; Florez and Cortissoz, 2017; Gouett et al , 2011; Hwang, 2010; Ko and Han, 2015; Kubečková and Smugala, 2020; Mao et al , 2018; Mine et al , 2015; Ouga et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although traditional methods have some limitations for site monitoring, such as time-consuming, operose, missing or incomplete information, resulting in a slow flow of information, make effective decision-making difficult, labor-intensive and high expenses (Kimoto et al , 2005; Luo et al , 2018; Naoum, 2015; Omar et al , 2018; Yang et al , 2015), they have been used in several studies to monitor the productivity of different indoor activities (such as tiling, plastering, masonry work, false ceiling boarding and fixing and application of screed) and outdoor activities (such as formwork, reinforcement steel activities, MEP, concrete work and curtain wall) (Alchaer and Issa, 2020; Azhar et al , 2020; Bhatti et al , 2019; Chui et al , 2012; Florez and Cortissoz, 2017; Gouett et al , 2011; Hwang, 2010; Ko and Han, 2015; Kubečková and Smugala, 2020; Mao et al , 2018; Mine et al , 2015; Ouga et al , 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building the time-period of future projects is predicted on the basis of the probability calculation carried out in the already implemented projects. The principle of Khanzadi's method is comparable with the method presented by Kubečková and Smugala (2020). The difference consists in prediction of the process duration, which is based on the evaluation of real implemented performances at the construction site according to Smugala's solution.…”
Section: Related Work From Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation applications are the subject of studies proposed by Han et al (2014), which are based on the real data recorded at the given construction site that were used for the construction process modeling. This system is based on an analogous principle as the model presented by Kubečková and Smugala (2020), which was used in the Czech Republic. Compared with Han's study the method proposed by Smugala explored another type of building and evaluated more construction processes making up the whole structure.…”
Section: Related Work From Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%