2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Abstract: The ever-expanding choice of ocular metrology and imaging equipment has driven research into the validity of their measurements. Consequently, studies of the agreement between two instruments or clinical tests have proliferated in the ophthalmic literature. It is important that researchers apply the appropriate statistical tests in agreement studies. Correlation coefficients are hazardous and should be avoided. The 'limits of agreement' method originally proposed by Altman and Bland in 1983 is the statistical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
320
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
320
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cant difference in the distribution of test results was found between eyes, only data from the left eye were used for subsequent analyses because averaging the data from both eyes would add little information and could potentially confound correlation and repeatability analyses. 28 For reference values, normality of the data was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Nonnormally distributed data are presented as median and 95% CR (2.5th to 97.5th percentile).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cant difference in the distribution of test results was found between eyes, only data from the left eye were used for subsequent analyses because averaging the data from both eyes would add little information and could potentially confound correlation and repeatability analyses. 28 For reference values, normality of the data was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Nonnormally distributed data are presented as median and 95% CR (2.5th to 97.5th percentile).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further consideration is bias when two eyes of one patient are used as there is a greater intra-correlation between the two eyes of one patient compared with the inter-correlation between the two eyes of two different patients. 18 Specific bias issues including small sample sizes (power calculation) and confounding factors are discussed below in the review of each trial.…”
Section: Sources Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the repeatability of repeated measurements, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated 18 . The ICC was defined as the ratio of the betweensubject variance to the sum of the pooled within-subject (S w ) and between-subject variances.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%