Skin Cancer and UV Radiation 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-60771-4_113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Methods for Evaluating the Efficacy of Screening Programs for Skin Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a situation the average speci®city of 59.5% can be considered a good indicator of the diagnostic potential of the method for detecting the melanomas. Also the PPV of 17.5% is of the same order as the values reported for classical screening programs carried out in U.S.A. and the Netherlands [PPV 11% and 18% according to data presented by Trampisch et al (1997)]. It should be noticed, however, that according to other studies of screening programs from 35% to 50% of clinically diagnosed melanomas are con®rmed by histopathologic examinations (Bologna et al, 1990;Koh et al, 1990;Leffel et al, 1993;Wolf et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In such a situation the average speci®city of 59.5% can be considered a good indicator of the diagnostic potential of the method for detecting the melanomas. Also the PPV of 17.5% is of the same order as the values reported for classical screening programs carried out in U.S.A. and the Netherlands [PPV 11% and 18% according to data presented by Trampisch et al (1997)]. It should be noticed, however, that according to other studies of screening programs from 35% to 50% of clinically diagnosed melanomas are con®rmed by histopathologic examinations (Bologna et al, 1990;Koh et al, 1990;Leffel et al, 1993;Wolf et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%