Statistical methods in physical mapping

Abstract

DISCLAIMERThis document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency ofthe United States Government.Neither the United States Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, producf or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial produds, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by theunited StatesGovernment or theuniversity ofCalifornia. Theviewsand opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or the University of California, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.This report has been reproduced directly from the b e t available copy. The last chapter explores unsolved problems and describes future work.

Statistical Aspects in Physical Mapping Application to the Genome of O. oeni Strain GM

“…Nelson and Speed (1994), Nelson (1995), and Branscomb et al (1990) use a list of standardized fragment lengths as a fingerprint of each clone. Michiels et al (1987), Fu, Timberlake, and Arnold (1992), Alizadeh et al (1995), and Nelson, Speed, and Yu (1997) address aspects related to hybridization fingerprinting.…”