1996
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910350219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis

Abstract: Two questions arising in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired during periodic sensory stimulation are: i) how to measure the experimentally determined effect in fMRI time series; and ii) how to decide whether an apparent effect is significant. Our approach is first to fit a time series regression model, including sine and cosine terms at the (fundamental) frequency of experimental stimulation, by pseudogeneralized least squares (PGLS) at each pixel of an image. Sinusoidal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
442
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 646 publications
(457 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
10
442
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem was that fMRI times series' autocorrelation violates a basic assumption needed by permutation, exchangeability. Others had tackled this problem, by decorrelating the fMRI data using the fit of a parametric autocorrelation model (Bullmore et al, 1996;Locascio et al, 1997), however we found this mix of parametric and nonparametric modeling unsatisfactory 17 . However fMRI analysis quickly came to focus on group analysis using a summary statistic approach Mumford & Nichols, 2009), meaning our PET 1-scan-per-subject permutation methods remained relevant.…”
Section: Permutationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem was that fMRI times series' autocorrelation violates a basic assumption needed by permutation, exchangeability. Others had tackled this problem, by decorrelating the fMRI data using the fit of a parametric autocorrelation model (Bullmore et al, 1996;Locascio et al, 1997), however we found this mix of parametric and nonparametric modeling unsatisfactory 17 . However fMRI analysis quickly came to focus on group analysis using a summary statistic approach Mumford & Nichols, 2009), meaning our PET 1-scan-per-subject permutation methods remained relevant.…”
Section: Permutationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Another less-used alternative to FWE is the expected number of false positives (Bullmore et al, 1996). This measure is used in the CamBA software 6 to control the expected number of 4 People often say "FWE is conservative", but that's like saying a meter is too short.…”
Section: Statistics P's and Corrected P'smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly active voxels for the saccade task and for the hypercapnia task were identified using a GLM analysis with a Fourier basis set in SPM2 (Bullmore, et al 1996;Handwerker, Daniel A 13 Josephs, et al 1997). For the saccade task, the temporal derivative of the three spatial and three rotational motion correction parameters were included as covariates of no interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictors for the GLM were generated by convolving a Gaussian function with each event (Plichta et al, 2007). To estimate the amplitude of the oxygenation response beta-values for each predictor were calculated by a least squares model fitting procedure maximizing model-to-data fitting (Bullmore et al, 1996). The first and second temporal derivative of each prediction term was included to adapt the onset and dispersion of the model functions to the individual's hemodynamic response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%