1978
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90004-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
228
0
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
228
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have examined the relative contributions of several sources of variation in dietary data (Liu et al, 1978;Beaton et al, 1979;Rush & Kristal, 1982;McGee et al, 1982;Todd et al, 1983;Beaton et al, 1983;Hunt et al, 1983;Sempos et al, 1985;Tangney et al, 1987;McAvay & Rodin, 1988;Nelson et al, 1989;Hartman et al, 1990;Neuhaus et al, 1991;Wassertheil-Smoller et al, 1993). These investigations have generally compared the intra-and interindividual variations within a population, but no studies have reported the relative contribution of within-population and between-population variance to total variability between populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have examined the relative contributions of several sources of variation in dietary data (Liu et al, 1978;Beaton et al, 1979;Rush & Kristal, 1982;McGee et al, 1982;Todd et al, 1983;Beaton et al, 1983;Hunt et al, 1983;Sempos et al, 1985;Tangney et al, 1987;McAvay & Rodin, 1988;Nelson et al, 1989;Hartman et al, 1990;Neuhaus et al, 1991;Wassertheil-Smoller et al, 1993). These investigations have generally compared the intra-and interindividual variations within a population, but no studies have reported the relative contribution of within-population and between-population variance to total variability between populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9]39,[47][48][49] Hence the goal of dietary assessment had to be to approximate as closely as possible true intake of each individual participant for each of 4 days, and then use 4-day mean values for each person in analyses, thereby lessening the role of intraindividual variation in producing coefficients for nutrient-BP relations less than true values (the regression-dilution problem). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Multiple procedures, stipulated in the Protocol and Manuals of Operations, were implemented to accomplish the goal of collecting dietary data of high-order validity for each participant. All these sought to minimize known sources of error; for this purpose they drew upon experience of preceding studies and the literature on cognitive behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single 24-h recalls are limited and generally inadequate for assessing the diet of individuals. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Multiple recalls enable measurement of intraindividual variability in nutrient intake, and use of mean values yields greater reliability for each person. They also reduce inter-individual measurement variability.…”
Section: Collection Of Dietary Datafprocess and Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were shown to be non-adjusted and adjusted for energy, according to the residual method proposed by Willett and Stampfer (1986). Taking into account the within-person variability present in the food intake quantified by the 4 days of 24 h dietary recalls, the within-and between-person variation components were determined, in order to 'de-attenuate' the coefficients of Pearson's correlation (Liu et al, 1978;Beaton et al, 1979Beaton et al, , 1983. For interpretation of correlation coefficients, the range from 0.4 to 0.7 was considered (Willett, 1998) as the acceptable reference for relative method validation.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, the food intake variation has been studied by several authors (Liu et al, 1978;Beaton et al, 1979Beaton et al, , 1983Sempos et al, 1985;Basiotis et al, 1987;Nelson et al, 1997b;Willett, 1998), providing a better analysis of the estimates found in their components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%