2019
DOI: 10.1101/617225
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modeling, estimation, and remediation of sample index hopping in multiplexed droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq data

Abstract: Sample index hopping can substantially confound the analysis of multiplexed sequencing data due to the resulting erroneous assignment of some, or even all, of the sequencing reads generated by a cDNA fragment in a given sample to other samples. In those target samples, the data cross-contamination artifact takes the form of "phantom molecules", molecules that exist only in the data by virtue of read misassignment. The presence of phantom molecules in droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq data should be a cause of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…scRNA-seq experiments of thousands of cells experience additional demultiplexing challenges including sequencing errors and hopping of barcodes/indices, which can prevent the collapse of reads to their appropriate UMI, cell, and library barcode. In large-scale, complex experiments, these issues require attention, and several methods are available to correct for UMI and cellular barcode errors (23) and index hopping (24).…”
Section: Processing Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…scRNA-seq experiments of thousands of cells experience additional demultiplexing challenges including sequencing errors and hopping of barcodes/indices, which can prevent the collapse of reads to their appropriate UMI, cell, and library barcode. In large-scale, complex experiments, these issues require attention, and several methods are available to correct for UMI and cellular barcode errors (23) and index hopping (24).…”
Section: Processing Artifactsmentioning
confidence: 99%