2004
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2004.836169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Modeling of Complex Backgrounds for Foreground Object Detection

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of background modeling for foreground object detection in complex environments. A Bayesian framework that incorporates spectral, spatial, and temporal features to characterize the background appearance is proposed. Under this framework, the background is represented by the most significant and frequent features, i.e., the principal features, at each pixel. A Bayes decision rule is derived for background and foreground classification based on the statistics of principal features… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
591
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 920 publications
(591 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
591
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key point of the test image has been matched with the background key point [13] of the template image as shown in The object which has been matched with the template image has been selected from the test image and converted into a binary image. Before the conversion of the binary image the test image on the whole gets converted into binary image [15]. Thus the converted binary image of both the test image and the detected object undergoes subtraction thus to obtain the area acquired by the detected object.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key point of the test image has been matched with the background key point [13] of the template image as shown in The object which has been matched with the template image has been selected from the test image and converted into a binary image. Before the conversion of the binary image the test image on the whole gets converted into binary image [15]. Thus the converted binary image of both the test image and the detected object undergoes subtraction thus to obtain the area acquired by the detected object.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the other sequences are conceived to highlight the impact of one particular issue to the algorithm under test that are marked as Fg; False Negative (FN) the fraction of Fg pixels that are marked as Bg; Total Error (TE) the total number of misclassified pixels, normalized with respect to the image size. Moreover, we consider also the similarity measure S defined in [32]. It is a non-linear measure that fuses FP and FN and it is close to 1 if detected Fg regions correspond to the real ones, otherwise its value is close to 0.…”
Section: Benchmark Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It performs quite well for both stationary and non-stationary backgrounds among the existing methods in [8]. We evaluate these methods using the quantitative measure used in [31]. If F is a detected region and G the corresponding "ground truth," then the similarity measure between regions F and G is defined as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%