2009
DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2009.764.770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Models for Hardened Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete

Abstract: Problem statement: For predicting workability and hardened properties of SelfCompacting Concrete (SCC) no well known explicit formulation. Approach: Statistical models were carried out to model the influence of key mixture parameter (cement, water to powder ratio, fly ash and super plasticizer) on hardened properties affecting the performance of SCC. Such responses included compressive strength at 3, 7 and 28 days and modulus of elasticity. Thirty one mixtures were prepared to derive the numerical models and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The appropriateness of the entire quadratic model for projecting the compressive strength of concrete with steel slag substituted for typical coarse aggregate was evaluated; each parameter is shown in squared, interaction (product), linear, and constant terms; Equation 3a depicts the revealed model for data containing steel slag aggregate and Equation 3b indicates the model for steel slag absent. 51,52 There does not seem to be any evidence linking model predictions to mistaken words.…”
Section: Full Quadratic Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The appropriateness of the entire quadratic model for projecting the compressive strength of concrete with steel slag substituted for typical coarse aggregate was evaluated; each parameter is shown in squared, interaction (product), linear, and constant terms; Equation 3a depicts the revealed model for data containing steel slag aggregate and Equation 3b indicates the model for steel slag absent. 51,52 There does not seem to be any evidence linking model predictions to mistaken words.…”
Section: Full Quadratic Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The appropriateness of the entire quadratic model for projecting the compressive strength of concrete with steel slag substituted for typical coarse aggregate was evaluated; each parameter is shown in squared, interaction (product), linear, and constant terms; Equation depicts the revealed model for data containing steel slag aggregate and Equation indicates the model for steel slag absent 51,52 . There does not seem to be any evidence linking model predictions to mistaken words. CSslag containgoodbreak=β0goodbreak+β1tgoodbreak+β2truewcgoodbreak+β3normalCgoodbreak+β4FAgoodbreak+β5CAgoodbreak+β6SSAgoodbreak+β7ttruewcgoodbreak+β8tnormalCgoodbreak+β9tFAgoodbreak+β10tCAgoodbreak+β11tSSAgoodbreak+β12truewcnormalCgoodbreak+β13truewcFAgoodbreak+β140.25emtruewcCAgoodbreak+β15truewcSSAgoodbreak+β16CFAgoodbreak+β17CCAgoodbreak+β18CSSAgoodbreak+β19FACAgoodbreak+β20FASSAgoodbreak+β21CSSAgoodbreak+β22t2goodbreak+β23wc2goodbreak+β24C2goodbreak+β25FA2goodbreak+β26CA2goodbreak+β27SSA2, CSno0.25emslag containgoodbreak=β0goodbreak+β1tgoodbreak+β2truewcgoodbreak+β3normalCgoodbreak+β4FAgoodbreak+β5normalCgoodbreak+β6ttruewcgoodbreak+β7tnormalCgoodbreak+β8tFAgoodbreak+<...…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit formulations from these models were also presented. Besides, these formulations were validated with different experimental results gathered from the literature [Siddique 2003;Camões, Aguiar and Jalali 2005;Schindler, Barnes, Roberts and Rodriguez 2007;Qadi and Mustapha 2009]. These formulations results were compared with the experimental results and formulas results given by some national building codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To develop these models, among 137 experimental data presented with 81 different concrete containing FA mixtures collected from the eight different experimental studies [Siddique, 2004;Wee, Chin and Mansur 1996;Haque and Kayali 1998;Kim, Han, Park and Noh 1998;Nassif, Najm and Suksawang 2005;Mittal, Kaisare and Shetti 2005;Atiş 2009;Kou, Poon and Chan 2007], about 70% of the entire data (92 sets) was randomly separated as training set, and the remaining of the entire data (45 sets) was taken as testing set. Besides, the proposed equations used the explicit formulations obtained from training and testing sets in these models were validated with 122 experimental data presented with 51 different concrete containing FA mixtures collected from the four different experimental studies [Siddique 2003;Camões, Aguiar and Jalali 2005;Schindler, Barnes, Roberts and Rodriguez 2007;Qadi and Mustapha 2009] not used in the training and testing sets.…”
Section: Gene Expression Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the compressive strength of the HSC had increased from 71.8-79.0 MPa using 1.8% of BF while flexural strength had increased from 5.21-6.50 MPa. Qadi et al (2009) developed Statistical models to model the influence of key mixture parameter such as cement and fly ash on hardened properties affecting the performance of Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC). Their results presented numerical models that can be useful to reduce the test procedures and trials needed for the proportioning of self-compacting concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%