Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 1993 1993
DOI: 10.5244/c.7.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Partial Constraints for 3D Model Matching and Pose Estimation Problems

Abstract: We explore the potential of variance matrices to represent not just statistical error on object pose estimates but also partially constrained degrees of freedom. Using an iterated extended Kalman filter as an estimation tool, we generate, combine and predict partially constrained pose estimates from 3D range data. We find that partial constraints on the translation component of pose which occur frequently in practice are handled well by the method. However, coupled partial constraints between rotation and tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the estimation process allows accurate evaluation of the mean it is quite correct to use the process covariance to constrain the value of the estimated mean by allowing the estimate variance to reduce to zero (the issue of controllability of this system is discussed in depth in the later work [12]). In [11], where the covariance matrix is used to provide partial constraints on aligning patches of range data, it is noted that in certain degenerate cases there are problems with their algorithm, although this is not named as a controllability problem.…”
Section: Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the estimation process allows accurate evaluation of the mean it is quite correct to use the process covariance to constrain the value of the estimated mean by allowing the estimate variance to reduce to zero (the issue of controllability of this system is discussed in depth in the later work [12]). In [11], where the covariance matrix is used to provide partial constraints on aligning patches of range data, it is noted that in certain degenerate cases there are problems with their algorithm, although this is not named as a controllability problem.…”
Section: Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropy of feature error distribution in 2D data [12] and 3D range data [13] has been represented in covariance matrix form. This corresponds to an oriented weighting on the error measure so that position errors transverse to the edge direction are given a higher weighting than axial errors along the edge direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%