1978
DOI: 10.2307/2286629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Revised Edition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other areas of the cortex (CCX), such as the frontal accessory (FrAc) (WT-11wks = 13.9 ± 2.3 mm 3 vs R6/1 (11wks) = 7.35 ± 0.45 mm 3 , p<0.02) (47.1% decrease), and cingulate cortex (Cing) (WT-11wks = 7.57 ± 0.52 mm 3 vs R6/1 (11wks) = 5.0 ± 0.57 mm 3 , p<0.01) (33.97% decrease), significant presymptomatic volumetric decreases were accounted for. Additional normalization of each brain structure by the total brain volume on each experimental group and effect size analysis (Daly and Cohen, 1987;Rosenthal and Rosnow, 1984) is shown in Supplementary Table 1. These results show that the R6/1 model depicts changes as already described in other HD mouse models and was further analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other areas of the cortex (CCX), such as the frontal accessory (FrAc) (WT-11wks = 13.9 ± 2.3 mm 3 vs R6/1 (11wks) = 7.35 ± 0.45 mm 3 , p<0.02) (47.1% decrease), and cingulate cortex (Cing) (WT-11wks = 7.57 ± 0.52 mm 3 vs R6/1 (11wks) = 5.0 ± 0.57 mm 3 , p<0.01) (33.97% decrease), significant presymptomatic volumetric decreases were accounted for. Additional normalization of each brain structure by the total brain volume on each experimental group and effect size analysis (Daly and Cohen, 1987;Rosenthal and Rosnow, 1984) is shown in Supplementary Table 1. These results show that the R6/1 model depicts changes as already described in other HD mouse models and was further analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power analysis was performed using at alpha = 0.05 and number of predictors of = 7, to detect a medium Cohen’s d effect size = 0.15, and the total sample size was calculated to be 153 with an actual power of 0.95. The G*Power software 50 was used to determine the sample size and power calculations because of it is an open source software that is easy to use 51 53 . The sample size was however increased to the total sample size of 341 farmers, to accommodate two other studies that used the same survey instrument to collect information on ecological attitudes and willingness to pay using discrete choice experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used G*Power tools analysis to determine the appropriate number of subject in the study. For this research, researchers have set the alpha, power, and effect size values as α = 0.05, power = 0.80, and effect size = 0.50 based on Daly & Cohen, (1977) and Lipsey, (1990). Based on the G*Power analysis, the appropriate number of subjects for one group is 18 people or 36 people for both groups, thus 45 subjects for the study are suitable for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%