2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical power or more precise insights into neuro-temporal dynamics? Assessing the benefits of rapid temporal sampling in fMRI

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, fast fMRI data sampling may improve sensitivity per se , that is, by more precise insights into neuronal temporal dynamics rather than simply by providing more data points for a fixed scan time 41 . To test this assumption, in contrast to our previous simulations with fixed scan time and number of events, we considered a fixed number of data points (scans).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, fast fMRI data sampling may improve sensitivity per se , that is, by more precise insights into neuronal temporal dynamics rather than simply by providing more data points for a fixed scan time 41 . To test this assumption, in contrast to our previous simulations with fixed scan time and number of events, we considered a fixed number of data points (scans).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample sizes and statistical thresholds are known to have a major impact on the statistical power and accuracy of GLM-based ROI selection. Previous research has revealed that the GLM has limited statistical power when inferring from fMRI data [ 50 , 51 ]. However, we used GLM-based ROI selection in the real fMRI datasets, which may affect the final result when we estimate functional connectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the default AR(1) model, the method called FAST uses a collection of exponentially decaying functions and their derivatives to fit the time series autocorrelation, which also successfully reduces false positives. [38][39][40] After the estimation of the model contrast, images were generated for each participant to examine the brain activations corresponding to the experimental conditions of: Gain vs. Baseline [i.e., Gain (5 + 25 + 125) vs. Fixation] and Loss vs. Baseline [i.e., Loss (5 + 25 + 125) vs. Fixation].…”
Section: Task-related Brain Activation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post hoc analysis at a ROI-level was conducted using the R statistical environment. 38 The investigation into group differences involving the Apathetic, Non-Apathetic, and Control groups was carried out using one-way ANOVA tests. Subsequently, a post hoc Tukey analysis was applied to identify specific group differences.…”
Section: Post-hoc Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%