1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02521327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical process control and direct care staff performance

Abstract: A state-operated residential facility has for the past five years been using performance feedback as the primary method for improving direct care staff interactions with clients. The major problem with this approach is determining when staff performance is significantly above or below average. Statistical process control charts are being used to determine whether variations in staff performance are the result of common or special causes. Analysis of staff performance for one year suggests that variation in sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPC provides a systematic means of monitoring the amount of variability in a continuous production process. It has been used in mental health settings to measure consistency of service delivery at outpatient clinics (Green, 1999) and variations in treatment staff performance over time (Dey, Sluyter, & Keating, 1994). In SPC, samples are taken from a given process under investigation (e.g., FT fidelity in RFT) and plotted on a control chart to check for patterns that suggest systematic variation within the target sample when compared to pre-established control limits (e.g., fidelity benchmark values derived from MDFT studies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPC provides a systematic means of monitoring the amount of variability in a continuous production process. It has been used in mental health settings to measure consistency of service delivery at outpatient clinics (Green, 1999) and variations in treatment staff performance over time (Dey, Sluyter, & Keating, 1994). In SPC, samples are taken from a given process under investigation (e.g., FT fidelity in RFT) and plotted on a control chart to check for patterns that suggest systematic variation within the target sample when compared to pre-established control limits (e.g., fidelity benchmark values derived from MDFT studies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate this communication, monthly updates to the control charts used to monitor ongoing CQI projects are posted on a large bulletin board [and also distributed at meetings, and sent out by e-mail]'' (Ornstein et al, 34 p 353) 20 Knowing the clinical context helped in the interpretation of control charts 25 Discussing the issue that blood glucose tests are taken more frequently from patients whose blood glucose level is deranged, investigators argue that they ''interpret the charts in context, aware that points are weighted toward derangements'' (Oniki et al, 25 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To wit: Is it justified to single out therapist 30 due to his/her lower performance on two outcomes averaged across two clients? SPC is most powerful when employed in an assembly-line context as part of a continuous production process (e.g., Dey, Sluyter, & Keating, 1994), for example tracking clinical staff within a provider system over several years, in which deviations can be detected for a given time window as well as a given therapist (Green, 1999). And because it is designed to distinguish between normal variation and systematic uncontrolled variation, SPC may be ideal for supporting line clinicians who are responsible for consistent delivery of EBTs yet also expected to show natural variation in implementation across sessions and caseloads (Delgadillo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%