2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01264-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Process Modelling for Machining of Inhomogeneous Mineral Subsoil

Abstract: Because in the machining process of concrete tool wear and production time are very cost sensitive factors the adaption of the tools to the particular machining processes is of major interest. We show how statistical methods can be used to model the influences of the process parameters to the forces affecting the workpiece as well as the chip removal rate and the wear rate of the used diamond. Based on these models a geometrical simulation model can be derived which will help to predetermine optimal parameter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we discuss the time complexity of the presented scratch track model, the Raabe et al ( [13], [14], [15]) model and the Herbrandt et al [5] model, which includes first simplifications of the Raabe et al [13] model in order to reduce the time complexity.…”
Section: Comparison Of Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we discuss the time complexity of the presented scratch track model, the Raabe et al ( [13], [14], [15]) model and the Herbrandt et al [5] model, which includes first simplifications of the Raabe et al [13] model in order to reduce the time complexity.…”
Section: Comparison Of Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model of Raabe et al ( [13], [14], [15]) the workpiece is simulated with two sets of n R and k R points, where n R < k R (coarse and fine lattice). For each point of the first set a value from a Gaussian random field (time complexity O n 3 R , [9]) is sampled.…”
Section: Comparison Of Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation