2001
DOI: 10.1201/9781420038675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Quality Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The exponentially weighted moving average method (EWMA; Chandra, 2001;Roberts, 1959) is a statistical quality control method that can detect shifts in performance as RTs increase. A cutoff threshold is set where the performance is judged to be above chance level.…”
Section: Appendix a Outlier Treatment Methods Exponentially Weighted mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponentially weighted moving average method (EWMA; Chandra, 2001;Roberts, 1959) is a statistical quality control method that can detect shifts in performance as RTs increase. A cutoff threshold is set where the performance is judged to be above chance level.…”
Section: Appendix a Outlier Treatment Methods Exponentially Weighted mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three columns of the orthogonal array are empty because only 13 factors are assigned to the L 16 (2 15 ) OA. Replicating the experiment can often reduce the effects of high variability on experimental results.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard orthogonal array [8] shown in Table 2 was employed for the present investigation. This array is designated by the symbol L 16 (2 15 ), is used to design experiments involving up to fifteen 2 level factors and has 16 rows and 15 columns. Each row represents a trial condition with factor levels indicated by the numbers in the row.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jeya Chandra (2001) That is, if the quality characteristic is the outer diameter of the component (say a shaft), then the oversized components are classified as minor defectives, since these components can be reworked. However the undersize components are classified as Major/Critical defectives, since these components cannot be reworked and have to be scraped.…”
Section: Modified Single Sampling Plan (Mssp)mentioning
confidence: 99%