2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical reliability analysis of satellites by mass category: Does spacecraft size matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to observe the effects of the failure rate on the optimized spare strategy solutions, a sensitivity analysis is performed for several values of failure rates. As can be derived from [34] and [35], failure rates can range from 0.001 to 0. The relative percentage of savings when using our unique multi-echelon approach using parking orbits compared to a single level of in-plane spares only is analyzed with respect to the TESSAC of each strategy.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to observe the effects of the failure rate on the optimized spare strategy solutions, a sensitivity analysis is performed for several values of failure rates. As can be derived from [34] and [35], failure rates can range from 0.001 to 0. The relative percentage of savings when using our unique multi-echelon approach using parking orbits compared to a single level of in-plane spares only is analyzed with respect to the TESSAC of each strategy.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first study, produced as a follow-up paper to Castet and Saleh's survey, was performed by Dubos and investigates whether satellite reliability can be related to satellite size [25]. The same 1548 satellites from their previous paper were split into three groups according to mass: small (0-500 kg), medium (500-2500 kg) and large (>2500 kg).…”
Section: The Poor Reliability Of Low-cost Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant reliability plots, derived through analytical means for the traditional microsatellite's avionics and simulation for the multicellular system, are shown in Figure 7. 25. In contrast to the CubeSat-scale system, the microsatellite-scale multicellular architecture shows a reliability advantage over the traditional, cross-strapped design, in all modes of operation.…”
Section: Reliability Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies are narrow in scope and lack a generalized methodology for the broader process of mission design and development. The third category is related to mission failures, whether review of missions or probabilistic analysis of system reliability [5,6,7]. According to [7], in a survey of 2500 spacecraft failures, 25% of the problems were attributed to design (functionality), 20% due to the environment and 24% were parts and quality related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%