2004
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Significance and Clinical Relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the purpose of preclinical exploratory trials is to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of an intervention [16,36]. When evaluating the validity of a study, it is important to consider both the clinical and statistical significance of the findings [53]. Studies that claim clinical relevance may lack sufficient statistical significance to make meaningful statements or, conversely, may lack practicality despite showing a statistically significant difference in treatment options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the purpose of preclinical exploratory trials is to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of an intervention [16,36]. When evaluating the validity of a study, it is important to consider both the clinical and statistical significance of the findings [53]. Studies that claim clinical relevance may lack sufficient statistical significance to make meaningful statements or, conversely, may lack practicality despite showing a statistically significant difference in treatment options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that claim clinical relevance may lack sufficient statistical significance to make meaningful statements or, conversely, may lack practicality despite showing a statistically significant difference in treatment options. Researchers and clinicians should not focus on small P values alone to decide whether a treatment is clinically useful; it is necessary to also consider the magnitude(s) of treatment differences and the power of the study [53]. Encouraging in this context is the observation that most of the between-groups comparisons for adherence show medium or medium-to-high magnitude(s) of treatment differences in favor of the tablet groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical significance—a meaningful change in the symptomatic state or functioning of an individual patient—requires independent replication of results [19]. Different fields have different criteria for clinical significance.…”
Section: Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berk and Freedman (2003) have made a strong case that the assumptions of random and independent sampling from a population are rarely true. The problems are particularly salient in the clinical sciences, where the falsity of the assumptions, as well as the divergences between statistical and clinical significance, are particularly obvious and dramatic (Bhardwaj et al, 2004;Ferrill et al, 2010;Fethney, 2010;Page, 2014). However, statistical tests not only test hypotheses but countless assumptions and the entire environment in which research takes place (Amrhein et al, 2018;Greenland, 2017Greenland, , 2018.…”
Section: Questioning the Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%