2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022ja030273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Study of Favorable Foreshock Ion Properties for the Formation of Hot Flow Anomalies and Foreshock Bubbles

Abstract: The ion foreshock is filled with backstreaming foreshock ions (Eastwood et al., 2005) that are observed mainly in the quasi-parallel regime (the angle between the shock normal and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) Bn < 45° ) but can extend to the quasi-perpendicular regime with 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴Bn up to ∼60° (Savoini et al., 2013). In the ion foreshock, two types of foreshock transients, hot flow anomalies (HFAs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a recent statistical study by T. Z. Liu et al. (2022) shows that larger density ratios and higher kinetic energies of the foreshock ions favor the formation of FBs and HFAs, consistent with our simulation results. As for the thermal speed, however, T. Z. Liu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, a recent statistical study by T. Z. Liu et al. (2022) shows that larger density ratios and higher kinetic energies of the foreshock ions favor the formation of FBs and HFAs, consistent with our simulation results. As for the thermal speed, however, T. Z. Liu et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As for the thermal speed, however, T. Z. Liu et al. (2022) show that a larger gyroradius calculated from the perpendicular thermal speed is a favorable condition, instead of the thermal speed. It is more likely the foreshock ion gyroradius relative to the discontinuity parameters that determines the early formation; but this requires further tests in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the downstream background foreshock, the ion distribution function indicates that backstreaming foreshock ions are in the anti‐parallel direction (Figure 6h) and have bunched gyrophases (Figure 6i, perpendicular cut at V para = −1,000 km/s) corresponding to the narrow yellow beam in Figure 6d. After we remove the solar wind ion beam from the ion distributions (see detailed methods in Liu, Angelopoulos et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2022), we calculate the foreshock ion moments. Figure 6e shows that the ratio of foreshock ion density to total density is 2%–4%.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, a foreshock bubble (FB) shock and FB sheath form at its boundary. In the core, the solar wind density (black) is nearly 0, whereas foreshock ion density (orange) is enhanced as they are trapped in the core (e.g., Liu, An, et al., 2020; Liu, Angelopoulos et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2022). So, the ion moments, there, are strongly affected by the foreshock ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we discuss below, this method typically fails to fully remove the background population since the thermal velocity is typically quite large in the MSH region and even when two populations co-exist they correspond to measurements closer than one Vth to each other in velocity space. It should be noted that this technique could work well when applied to foreshock events, since in that case, the reflected particles and the SW-beam like population are well separated from each other (e.g., Liu et al, 2017Liu et al, , 2022.…”
Section: Jet Moment Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%