2005
DOI: 10.3133/sir20045266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical summaries of streamflow in Montana and adjacent areas, water years 1900 through 2002

Abstract: In response to the need to have more current information about streamflow characteristics in Montana, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, and Bureau of Land Management, conducted a study to analyze streamflow data. Updated statistical summaries of streamflow characteristics are presented for 286 streamflowgaging sites in Montana and adjacent areas having 10 or more years of record for water years 1900 through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 14‐day duration reflects the most likely time it takes to achieve NB in shallow parts of the river if nutrients are elevated (fewer days would be more protective, more days less protective), while the five‐year recurrence frequency is close to USEPA's long‐standing recommendation (i.e., once in three years) while being slightly protective. In addition, the design flow coincides with low‐flow statistics regularly reported by the U.S. Geological Survey (McCarthy, ). The provisional 14Q5 for the Yellowstone River is 118.7 m 3 /s at Miles City (at gage no.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The 14‐day duration reflects the most likely time it takes to achieve NB in shallow parts of the river if nutrients are elevated (fewer days would be more protective, more days less protective), while the five‐year recurrence frequency is close to USEPA's long‐standing recommendation (i.e., once in three years) while being slightly protective. In addition, the design flow coincides with low‐flow statistics regularly reported by the U.S. Geological Survey (McCarthy, ). The provisional 14Q5 for the Yellowstone River is 118.7 m 3 /s at Miles City (at gage no.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Like other rivers at temperate latitudes, the Yellowstone River has a strong summer snowmelt signal followed by a low and stable base‐flow period when nutrient excursions are most evident. Water yield is 334 m 3 /s annually (USGS 06309000 Yellowstone River at Miles City, Montana), whereas base flow is 177 m 3 /s (McCarthy, ; see Figure later), thereby reducing the assimilative volume for dilution during the summer low‐flow period. Of the major influent tributaries (e.g., Bighorn, Tongue, and Powder Rivers), only the Bighorn River contributes appreciably to streamflow during the summer months (releasing stored irrigation water from Yellowtail Dam).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov: Accessed May 21, 2009). (b) Streamflow hydrology (m 3 /s) which was between the 5th and 25th percentile (shaded gray), or roughly equivalent to 5‐10 year low‐flow frequency (McCarthy, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Corwin Springs (station 06191500), the upstreammost station in the reach, the average channel slope (reach slope) is 13.9 ft/mi, the drainage area upstream from the gaging station is 2,619 mi 2 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2005), and the mean-annual discharge is 3,120 ft 3 /s (McCarthy, 2005). At Sidney (station 06329500), the downstream-most station in the reach, the average channel slope (reach slope), is 2.5 ft/mi, the drainage area upstream from the gaging station is 69,083 mi 2 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2005), and the mean-annual discharge is 12,300 ft 3 /s (McCarthy, 2005). Between Corwin Springs and Sidney, seven major tributaries join the Yellowstone River: Shields River, Boulder River, Stillwater River, Clarks Fork Yellowstone River, Bighorn River, Tongue River, and Powder River (table 2, fig.…”
Section: Computer Program For Estimating Instream Travel Times and Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Low-flow discharges are the 1-day, 2-year annual low-flow discharges (McCarthy, 2005). The computed mean-annual discharge might not consistently increase in the downstream direction, primarily because the period of record is not the same for all streamflow-gaging stations.…”
Section: Computer Program For Estimating Instream Travel Times and Comentioning
confidence: 99%