“…In addition, pore structure mapping directly from the real sample can provide the physical framework for pore-scale network models (Bryant et al, 1993;Bhattad et al, 2010), in which pore geometry and topology are incorporated explicitly, therefore no adjustable parameters, such as porosity, tortuosity, and relative permeability, are required for single-or multi-phase flow simulations (e.g., Blunt et al, 1992;Hilpert et al, 2000;Gladkikh and Bryant, 2005). Many efforts have been used to quantitatively characterize pore structure with different methods, which can be classified as direct imaging methods and various indirect methods as described by Amirtharaj et al (2011). The direct imaging methods, such as backscatter scanning electron microscopy (Ioannidis et al, 1996), X-ray computed tomography (XCT) with either conventional or synchrotron radiation (Brusseau et al, 2006;Dong and Blunt, 2009;Fredrich et al, 2006;Wildenschild et al, 2002), and Focus Ion Beam nanotomography (FIB-nt, Bera et al, 2011;Holzer and Cantoni, 2011;Keller et al, 2011), in recent decades have been used to construct the 3D pore structure and phase distributions in pore scale for natural and synthetic porous media.…”