2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical testing of baseline differences in sports medicine RCTs: a systematic evaluation

Abstract: Background/AimThe CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement discourages reporting statistical tests of baseline differences between groups in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). However, this practice is still common in many medical fields. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of this practice in leading sports medicine journals.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search in Medline through PubMed to identify RCTs published in the years 2005 and 2015 from 10 high-impact sports medicine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore of no use to statistically test for baseline differences between the treatment and the control group. This testing nonsense has been noticed by other authors as well [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It is therefore of no use to statistically test for baseline differences between the treatment and the control group. This testing nonsense has been noticed by other authors as well [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test compared the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The assessment of interaction effects among baseline parameters was carried out by mixed factorial design ANOVA ( Peterson et al, 2017 ). For within-group analysis, paired t -test was used to study the difference between pre- to post-intervention for normally distributed data, or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous variables without normal distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression estimates will be adjusted for participant differences in the number of observations contributing to the mixed models and for variances within subjects [46]. Although gender and age were balanced at baseline, the interaction effects of these variables and treatment should not be omitted [47]. Therefore, fixed effects of the linear mixed models will include testing for time (T1-T4) and treatment (IG-1, IG-2, IG-3 and PCG) effects, adjusted for baseline values, age, gender, and PE class type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%