1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1985.tb01400.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical transformations of indices of gingivitis measured non‐invasively

Abstract: An index (PMGI) that combines the Massler-Schour (PMA) and Löe-Silness (GI) indices for non-invasive scoring of gingivitis was applied in 2 independent comparative clinical studies. 4 statistical transformations of the scores of individual papillary and marginal units were analyzed: the whole-mouth mean, its square root, the proportion of units judged to be inflamed, and its arc sin transformation. According to the criteria of how closely the transformations produced approximately normal distributions, and of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alpha diversity measures and relative abundance of microbial taxa at the phylum level were subjected to normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk), and all non-normally distributed data were rank transformed. Correlation analyses were performed using normalized data when appropriate using the arc sin square root function (Fleiss et al, 1985; Varkoohi et al, 2007); however data are depicted as relative OTU’s for ease of interpretation. Correction for multiple comparisons was conducted using the Benjamini-Hochberg step down method (Benjamini et al, 2001) implemented in the QIIME 1.8.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alpha diversity measures and relative abundance of microbial taxa at the phylum level were subjected to normality tests (Shapiro-Wilk), and all non-normally distributed data were rank transformed. Correlation analyses were performed using normalized data when appropriate using the arc sin square root function (Fleiss et al, 1985; Varkoohi et al, 2007); however data are depicted as relative OTU’s for ease of interpretation. Correction for multiple comparisons was conducted using the Benjamini-Hochberg step down method (Benjamini et al, 2001) implemented in the QIIME 1.8.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gingivitis was assessed in each animal using two clinical indices of gingival inflammation adapted from human dentistry 35 and validated for veterinary use: Gingivitis Index (GI) 36,37 performed under general anesthesia and described in detail (Table 2), and Papillary-Marginal-Gingivitis Index (PMGI), a non-intrusive visual index routinely used in human dentistry for non-invasive scoring of gingivitis. 38,39 This index, for the first time applied in dogs, is described in detail (Table 3).…”
Section: Oral Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, there is no getting around the fact that the distribution of whole mouth means in the kinds of trials which we have examined are markedly skewed, which does bother conservative data analysts. In reporting the effect of various transformations of gingivitis scores, Fleiss et al (1985) have stated, "Based on the criteria of nearly normal distributions and the power to detect treatment effects, the square root of the whole-mouth mean is the preferred transformation for use in clinical trials of antigingivitis agents when gingivitis is measured noninvasively." We have also found this to be true in examining a data set from the University of Pennsylvania in which one of us was involved, where the Loe-Silness index, an invasive index, was used for scoring gingivitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, "noninvasive" indices, which just involve visual evaluations without probing, have been recomtnended by some investigators. There has been one study, however, which apparently shows that by using enough time between three "invasive" examinations, the third examiner was able to obtain a high level of comparability with previous ones (Bollmer et al 1985).…”
Section: Examiner Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%