Statistics decrypted—a comprehensive review and smartphone-assisted five-step approach for good statistical practice

Abstract

Background Statistic scripts are often made by mathematicians and cryptic for clinicians or non-mathematician scientists. Nevertheless, almost all research projects necessitate the application of some statistical tests or at least an understanding thereof. The present review aims on giving an overview of the most common statistical terms and concepts. It further ensures good statistical practice by providing a five-step approach guiding the reader to the correct statistical test. Methods and results First, different types of variables and measurements to describe a data set with means of descriptive statistics are introduced. The basic thoughts and tools of interferential statistics are presented, and different types of bias are discussed. Then in the final paragraph, the most commonly used statistical tests are described. A smartphone app accessible via QR code finally guides the reader in five steps to the correct statistical test, depending on the data used in order to avoid commonly performed mistakes. Conclusions The five-step approach sets a new minimal standard for good statistical practice.

Modules From the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium: Japan Core Curriculum Necessary for Second- to Fourth-Year Nurses as Assessed by Advanced Practice Registered Nurses

“…First, we excluded data with missing values of 20% or more [ 16 ] from the analysis. We summarized the characteristics of the participants using descriptive analysis [ 17 ] and their responses to the necessary modules as the number of respondents who selected the module and the proportion of selected items divided by the total number of respondents. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (Redmond, USA).…”

Screening of dysphagia in geriatrics

“…Statistical Package for Social Science (IBM SPSS) version 20 was used for statistical analysis [ 27 ]. Qualitative data were presented as numbers & percentages.…”

Routine Ophthalmological Examination Rates in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Are Low and Must Be Improved

“…It is important to note that the Retinopathy− , Retinopathy+ , routine eye exams and non-routine eye exams groups did not have a normal distribution of age. The assumption of normality is less important for basic parametric tests with increasing sample size [ 17 ]. Since we had a large sample size, we performed Welch’s t -test for comparison of age despite the lack of normal distribution.…”