2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics of “Cold” Early Impulsive Solar Flares in X-Ray and Microwave Domains

Abstract: Solar flares often happen after a preflare / preheating phase, which is almost or entirely thermal. In contrast, there are the so-called early impulsive flares that do not show a (significant) preflare heating but instead often show the Neupert effect-a relationship where the impulsive phase is followed by a gradual, cumulative-like, thermal response. This has been interpreted as a dominance of nonthermal energy release at the impulsive phase, even though a similar phenomenology is expected if the thermal and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the triggered mode the count rates are measured in the same three channels with a varying time resolution from 2 to 256 ms and with the total duration of 250 s. The KONUS/WIND data have been used in application to solar flares (e.g. Fleishman et al 2016;Lysenko et al 2018). The HXR count rate from KONUS/WIND in G2 channel for our flare is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Photospheric Signals And Hxr Time Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the triggered mode the count rates are measured in the same three channels with a varying time resolution from 2 to 256 ms and with the total duration of 250 s. The KONUS/WIND data have been used in application to solar flares (e.g. Fleishman et al 2016;Lysenko et al 2018). The HXR count rate from KONUS/WIND in G2 channel for our flare is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Photospheric Signals And Hxr Time Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microwave continuum bursts last typically from several seconds to minutes (see, for example, Nita et al 2004;Altyntsev et al 2008;Fleishman et al 2008;Lysenko et al 2018), while those with a subsecond duration are detected more rarely (Kaufmann et al 1980;Altyntsev et al 2000;Meshalkina et al 2004;Fleishman et al 2016b;Glesener & Fleishman 2018), likely, because the latter requires that some special conditions are met: (i) short and well separated episodes of electron acceleration; (ii) a high acceleration rate of electrons up to relativistic energies; and (iii) inefficient trapping of these electrons in the flaring coronal loops. However, when such subsecond subbursts are detected, their study can substantially narrow the list of possible acceleration processes given that only a subset of those processes will turn out capable of supporting that extreme acceleration efficiency at that short time scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Описанная картина является усредненной, и специфические проявления конкретной вспышки в различных диапазонах могут существенно отличаться от данного сценария. В частности, иногда наблюдаются «холодные» вспышки с крайне незначительным увеличением МР-излучения Masuda et al, 2013;Lysenko et al, 2018], а также radio-quiet-вспышки, сопровождаемые лишь незначительным радиоизлучением [Benz et al, 2007]. Другим отклонением от данного обобщенного сценария являются упомянутые выше квазипериодические вариации потоков вспышечного излучения, регистрируемые на всех фазах вспышки во всех наблюдательных диапазонах.…”
Section: наблюдения и феноменология солнечных вспышекunclassified