Status and future of numerical atmospheric aerosol prediction with a focus on data requirements

Abstract

Abstract. Numerical prediction of aerosol particle properties has become an important activity at many research and operational weather centers. This development is due to growing interest from a diverse set of stakeholders, such as air quality regulatory bodies, aviation and military authorities, solar energy plant managers, climate services providers, and health professionals. Owing to the complexity of atmospheric aerosol processes and their sensitivity to the underlying meteorological conditions, the prediction of aerosol particle concentrations and properties in the numerical weather prediction (NWP) framework faces a number of challenges. The modeling of numerous aerosol-related parameters increases computational expense. Errors in aerosol prediction concern all processes involved in the aerosol life cycle including (a) errors on the source terms (for both anthropogenic and natural emissions), (b) errors directly dependent on the meteorology (e.g., mixing, transport, scavenging by precipitation), and (c) errors related to aerosol chemistry (e.g., nucleation, gas-aerosol partitioning, chemical transformation and growth, hygroscopicity). Finally, there are fundamental uncertainties and significant processing overhead in the diverse observations used for verification and assimilation within these systems. Indeed, a significant component of aerosol forecast development consists in streamlining aerosol-related observations and reducing the most important errors through model development and data assimilation. Aerosol particle observations from satellite-and groundbased platforms have been crucial to guide model development of the recent years and have been made more readily available for model evaluation and assimilation. However, for the sustainability of the aerosol particle prediction activities around the globe, it is crucial that quality aerosol observations continue to be made available from different platforms (space, near surface, and aircraft) and freely shared. This paper reviews current requirements for aerosol observations in the context of the operational activities carried out at various global and regional centers. While some of the requirements are equally applicable to aerosol-climate, the focus here is on global operational prediction of aerosol properties such as mass concentrations and optical parameters. It is also recognized that the term "requirements" is loosely used here given the diversity in global aerosol observing systems and that utilized data are typically not from operational sources. Most operational models are based on bulk schemes that do not predict the size distribution of the aerosol particles. Others are based on a mix of "bin" and bulk schemes with limited capability of simulating the size information. However the next generation of aerosol operational models will output both mass and number density concentration to provide a more complete description of the aerosol population. A brief overview of the state of the art is provided with an introduction on the importance of ...

Current state of the global operational aerosol multi‐model ensemble: An update from the International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP)

“…These plans may include addition of aerosol species, update of emission inventories, addition/update of aerosol data assimilation, increased model resolution, improved parametrization of physical, chemical and/or optical properties and processes. These future plans also stress requirements for aerosol observations in the context of the operational activities carried out at various centres (Benedetti et al, 2018).…”

VIIRS Deep Blue Aerosol Products Over Land: Extending the EOS Long‐Term Aerosol Data Records

“…These were developed and implemented at the request of users interested in data assimilation (DA) applications of the data set, as the spatial coverage and near-real-time availability of the data stream make it attractive for DA applications. Meaningful pixel-level uncertainty estimates are needed for DA in order that their information can be weighted alongside other elements of the system (Benedetti et al, 2018).…”

Introducing the 4.4 km spatial resolution Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) aerosol product

“…Raw data from the MISR instrument, which require detailed engineering information to interpret, are designated as level 0 and are not generally distributed except within the science data-processing stream (Bothwell et al, 2002). The level 0 files are reformatted into level 1A Hierarchical Data Format for the Earth Observing System (HDF-EOS) files that utilize the now legacy HDF4 data structure.…”

“…The AGP files also contain the MISR DEM surface elevations and surface feature identifiers used to discriminate land and water (Nelson et al, 2013). Camera-viewing zenith and azimuth angles are obtained from the geometric parameters (GP_GMP) product (Bothwell et al, 2002;Nelson et al, 2013). Finally, the Terrestrial Atmosphere and Surface Climatology (TASC) data set provides monthly values of surface pressure, ozone, water vapor, snow and ice cover, and near-surface wind speed on a global 1 • by 1 • grid .…”