2016
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2015.1131740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and Habitat Use of Scaphirhynchus Sturgeons in an Important Fluvial Corridor: Implications for River Habitat Enhancement

Abstract: In the central United States, recovery efforts for populations of the federally endangered Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus have been ongoing since its listing in 1990. Its congener, the Shovelnose Sturgeon S. platorynchus, has also recently been listed as threatened where it overlaps with Pallid Sturgeon. The status of both species in the Mississippi River is unknown and so are habitat enhancement priorities that would benefit their recovery. Using field data collected from 2002 through 2005, we (1) estim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing use and positive selection of secondary channel habitat were consistent with increasing stage but differed with temperature at both reaches. As observed by Herrala et al (2014), the lack of use of secondary channels at low stages when water depth was shallow and current velocities were reduced agrees with the repeatedly observed preference of adult pallid sturgeon for relatively deep water and moderate current velocities (Hintz et al, 2016;Snook et al, 2002;Spindler, Chipps, Klumb, Graeb, & Wimberly, 2012). We found pallid sturgeon occupied secondary channels at a relatively small range of current velocities with 50% of detections ranging from 0.7-1.2 m/s (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Increasing use and positive selection of secondary channel habitat were consistent with increasing stage but differed with temperature at both reaches. As observed by Herrala et al (2014), the lack of use of secondary channels at low stages when water depth was shallow and current velocities were reduced agrees with the repeatedly observed preference of adult pallid sturgeon for relatively deep water and moderate current velocities (Hintz et al, 2016;Snook et al, 2002;Spindler, Chipps, Klumb, Graeb, & Wimberly, 2012). We found pallid sturgeon occupied secondary channels at a relatively small range of current velocities with 50% of detections ranging from 0.7-1.2 m/s (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, a mark‐recapture experiment in the MMR recently suggested a population of roughly 1,500 pallid sturgeon (Hintz et al. ), an estimate slightly above our 95% lower bound of 1,200–1,300 fish ≥3 years old and likely to include similar age classes. A prior range‐wide estimate of 6,000–21,000 individuals (Duffy et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It may also be confusing to compare lower bounds to estimates of mean abundance from other studies. For instance, a markrecapture experiment in the MMR recently suggested a population of roughly 1,500 pallid sturgeon (Hintz et al 2016), an estimate slightly above our 95% lower bound of 1,200-1,300 fish ࣙ3 years old and likely to include similar age classes. A prior range-wide estimate of 6,000-21,000 individuals (Duffy et al 1996) overlaps the 95% lower bound on population density in our study, although it is not clear what age classes were included in the wider estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also a group of benthic fishes that regularly use sand dunes. The US federally endangered pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus), for example, appear to use sand dunes in the Mississippi River basin of the central USA (Phelps et al, 2010;Hintz et al, 2016a;Hintz et al, 2016b). Decline of this endangered fluvial specialist is primarily attributed to habitat loss from river modifications throughout the Mississippi and Missouri rivers and several large tributaries (Keenlyne, 1989;Bramblett & White, 2001;USFWS, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%