2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany—A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
44
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, recently, this research field developed a sophisticated methodological framework for comprehensively analyzing and interpreting the data in the context of various research questions. The significant increase in the number of claims data studies (and frequency of policy-relevant research) confirms this trend [2,3] (see Fig. 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, recently, this research field developed a sophisticated methodological framework for comprehensively analyzing and interpreting the data in the context of various research questions. The significant increase in the number of claims data studies (and frequency of policy-relevant research) confirms this trend [2,3] (see Fig. 1).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Over the last 15 years, almost one-third of the published claims data studies have focused on health economics [2]. Furthermore, due to its advantages, researchers have previously used this data source for health services research on treatment patterns, under-and overtreatment of specific diseases, epidemiology studies, and as an input factor for modeling studies [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, it needs to be noted that a bottom-up approach could have potentially provided more accurate cost estimates than the top-down approach used in our analysis. However, claims data are a comprehensive and reliable basis that have become an important data source for health economic evaluations [41,42]. Furthermore, we only analyzed filled prescriptions in our database.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%