1976
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1976.10470328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and Problems of Regenerable Flue Gas Desulfurization Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many industrial processes, such as petrochemical and nonferrous metal smelting processes, a number of regenerable flue‐gas desulfurization (FGD) processes have been developed for the recovery of sulfur content from the high concentrations of SO 2 (Ratcliffe and Pap, 1980). Theoretically, SO 2 can be converted into several recovery forms, including sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, liquid sulfur dioxide, and carbon disulfide, which are strongly dependent on the selected approaches (Murthy et al, 1976; Bejarano et al, 2001). Among various FGD processes, the approach associated with the reduction of SO 2 to elemental sulfur has been widely used and requires the use of some effective reducing agents, such as CO and H 2 , and CH 4 , to react with SO 2 (Ratcliffe and Pap, 1980; Murthy et al, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For many industrial processes, such as petrochemical and nonferrous metal smelting processes, a number of regenerable flue‐gas desulfurization (FGD) processes have been developed for the recovery of sulfur content from the high concentrations of SO 2 (Ratcliffe and Pap, 1980). Theoretically, SO 2 can be converted into several recovery forms, including sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, liquid sulfur dioxide, and carbon disulfide, which are strongly dependent on the selected approaches (Murthy et al, 1976; Bejarano et al, 2001). Among various FGD processes, the approach associated with the reduction of SO 2 to elemental sulfur has been widely used and requires the use of some effective reducing agents, such as CO and H 2 , and CH 4 , to react with SO 2 (Ratcliffe and Pap, 1980; Murthy et al, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, SO 2 can be converted into several recovery forms, including sulfuric acid, elemental sulfur, liquid sulfur dioxide, and carbon disulfide, which are strongly dependent on the selected approaches (Murthy et al, 1976; Bejarano et al, 2001). Among various FGD processes, the approach associated with the reduction of SO 2 to elemental sulfur has been widely used and requires the use of some effective reducing agents, such as CO and H 2 , and CH 4 , to react with SO 2 (Ratcliffe and Pap, 1980; Murthy et al, 1976). The reaction associated with the use of CO and H 2 for reducing SO 2 to elemental sulfur is However, it should be noted that this process usually requires the use of CH 4 for the generation of CO and H 2 based on the following reaction: On the other hand, the conversion of SO 2 can also be carried out by directly using CH 4 according to the following reaction: where [S] represents the various resulting elemental forms of sulfur species including S 2 , S 6 , and S 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derived from limestone (CaCO 3 ), limewater in effect exchanges CO 2 for SO x to produce a commercial product in the form of gypsum (CaSO 4 ·2H 2 O). Given the usually low SO x concentrations of interest, most FGD systems are once-through processes, generating either a valuable or disposable product; a number of regenerable sorbents have, however, also been investigated …”
Section: Sorbent Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intent of this review is to introduce the·more important of these variables and to suggest their potential signifi-cance· in the transformation of effluents during transport from the source. A number of other recent reviews discuss in greater detail potential new advances in technology which may influence the future character of emissions from fossil-fue1 sources (Hall and Bowen 1976, Murthy et al 1976, White 1977, Coates 1976, Leavitt et aL 1976, CTAB 1975, dflll McDonald 1975.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Emission Chararteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%