2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18933-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and Prospects of Bacterial Inoculants for Sustainable Management of Agroecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioprospecting for beneficial microbes in diverse environments has been a key strategy for discovering novel and efficient bacterial strains to drive the production of quality microbial inoculant, a major resource in developing sustainable agroecosystems. Interestingly, several environments such as the rhizosphere, soil, and composts (Adeleke, Raimi, et al., 2019; Ahkami et al., 2017; Raimi et al., 2022), have been well studied for ecologically beneficial microbes. However, niches, including plant tissues, are rarely investigated for their phytobeneficial microbes, such as endophytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioprospecting for beneficial microbes in diverse environments has been a key strategy for discovering novel and efficient bacterial strains to drive the production of quality microbial inoculant, a major resource in developing sustainable agroecosystems. Interestingly, several environments such as the rhizosphere, soil, and composts (Adeleke, Raimi, et al., 2019; Ahkami et al., 2017; Raimi et al., 2022), have been well studied for ecologically beneficial microbes. However, niches, including plant tissues, are rarely investigated for their phytobeneficial microbes, such as endophytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some efficient N-fixing strains such as Rhizobium and Azotobacter spp. have successfully been formulated into commercial biofertilizers (Adeleke et al, 2019). However, the commercially available N biofertilizers mostly consist of Rhizobium and a few other bacteria such as Azotobacter, and Azospirillum species and are widely applicable to legume crops as presented in Section 4 (Vassilev et al, 2015;Adeleke et al, 2019).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…have successfully been formulated into commercial biofertilizers (Adeleke et al, 2019). However, the commercially available N biofertilizers mostly consist of Rhizobium and a few other bacteria such as Azotobacter, and Azospirillum species and are widely applicable to legume crops as presented in Section 4 (Vassilev et al, 2015;Adeleke et al, 2019). Nevertheless, inoculating crops and farms with such biofertilizers can meet the required N levels by plants and substantially reduce the application of artificial fertilizers (Aloo et al, 2022a).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already many bacterial biofertilizers in commercial use [ 3 ]. The most common are based on nitrogen-fixing microbes, such as Nitragin Gold ® containing Rhizobia , produced in the USA [ 126 ]; Nodulest 10 with Bradyrhizobium japonicum, from Argentina, or Azo-N with Azospirillum brasilense and Azospirillum lipoferum, from South Africa [ 3 , 127 ]. Some commercial biofertilizers are based on phosphate solubilizers, such as Phosphobacterin with Bacillus megaterium from Russia, or potassium solubilizers, such as K Sol B with Frateuria aurantia , from India [ 3 ].…”
Section: Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (Pgpb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commercial biofertilizers are based on phosphate solubilizers, such as Phosphobacterin with Bacillus megaterium from Russia, or potassium solubilizers, such as K Sol B with Frateuria aurantia , from India [ 3 ]. In addition, a few are phytostimulators, such as Amase ® with Pseudomonas azotoformans , and biocontrol agents, such as Cerall ® with Pseudomonas chlororaphis , both from Sweden [ 3 , 127 ].…”
Section: Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (Pgpb)mentioning
confidence: 99%