2010
DOI: 10.21236/ada581215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status and Trend of Cottonwood Forests Along the Missouri River

Abstract: Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Floodplain forests along the Missouri River in the Great Plains were historically dominated by plains cottonwood and later successional species including green ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall), American elm ( Ulmus americana L.), peachleaf willow ( Salix amygdaloides Anderson), and box elder ( Acer negundo L.), with tree species richness increasing downstream (Dixon, Johnson, Scott, & Bowen, ; Johnson, Burgess, & Keammerer, ; NRC, ; Wilson, ). Through flow regulation, land use conversion, and reservoir inundation, significant declines (estimated 70%) in floodplain forest area have occurred since the 1890s (Dixon et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Floodplain forests along the Missouri River in the Great Plains were historically dominated by plains cottonwood and later successional species including green ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall), American elm ( Ulmus americana L.), peachleaf willow ( Salix amygdaloides Anderson), and box elder ( Acer negundo L.), with tree species richness increasing downstream (Dixon, Johnson, Scott, & Bowen, ; Johnson, Burgess, & Keammerer, ; NRC, ; Wilson, ). Through flow regulation, land use conversion, and reservoir inundation, significant declines (estimated 70%) in floodplain forest area have occurred since the 1890s (Dixon et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dixon et al (, ) mapped land cover and sampled 332 forested sites across eight different Missouri River segments from Fort Benton, Montana, to Kansas City, Missouri, between 2006 and 2009. In this study, we resampled 168 sites across five study segments (one channelized and four unchannelized) in 2012, with about half of these sites resampled in both 2013 (84) and 2014 (81; Figure , Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…forested areas on the 2010 vegetation map that had been converted to river or bare sediment by 2012 computed by a remote sensing model using the WorldView and GeoEye data, see Strong, 2012 for model parameters), the proportions of the eroded forest in different age classes and species type, and the estimated mean density of trees with DBH (stem diameter at breast height) at least 30 cm in each forest age class and type, based on pre-flood field data on 66 stands sampled in 2008 (Dixon et al, 2010;Johnson et al, 2012). forested areas on the 2010 vegetation map that had been converted to river or bare sediment by 2012 computed by a remote sensing model using the WorldView and GeoEye data, see Strong, 2012 for model parameters), the proportions of the eroded forest in different age classes and species type, and the estimated mean density of trees with DBH (stem diameter at breast height) at least 30 cm in each forest age class and type, based on pre-flood field data on 66 stands sampled in 2008 (Dixon et al, 2010;Johnson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without channel movement or further narrowing in tbe future, similar pulses of cottonwood regeneration are unlikely to be repeated. The rate of cottonwood regeneration has declined in recent decades (Dixon et al 2010). The proximity of these rivermarginal patches to the main channel also makes them more vulnerable to erosion from ice and high flows than would have been the case for predam patches that established on the inside of dynamic river bends.…”
Section: Forty Years Of Vegetation Changementioning
confidence: 99%