2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status diagnosis and feature tracing of the natural gas pipeline weld based on improved random forest model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also manage missing data and outliers and is less susceptible to overfitting than other decision tree-based algorithms, making it more accurate at predicting the outcomes of new data (Liu et al, 2020). In addition, it can provide estimates of variable relevance, which facilitates the identification of the most pertinent factors for producing correct forecasts (Wang et al, 2022b).…”
Section: Algorithm Type Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also manage missing data and outliers and is less susceptible to overfitting than other decision tree-based algorithms, making it more accurate at predicting the outcomes of new data (Liu et al, 2020). In addition, it can provide estimates of variable relevance, which facilitates the identification of the most pertinent factors for producing correct forecasts (Wang et al, 2022b).…”
Section: Algorithm Type Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of research on the comprehensive risk assessment of long-distance pipelines in mountainous areas. Indeed, some scholars have begun to use machine learning methods for pipeline risk assessment, such as artificial neural networks, 11,12 support vector machines, 13,14 random forests, 15,16 and XGBoost. 17 While these methods can learn from large amounts of data and extract patterns and features related to pipeline risks, they do require substantial data support and rely on prior data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 It does not depend on the specific degradation patterns and only needs sufficient historical data, which is more suitable for RUL prediction of complex modeling systems. Traditional machine learning methods to predict the RUL of rolling bearings by extracting shallow features of the data, such as using support vector machine (SVM), 17 artificial neural network (ANN) 18 and random forest regression (RFR) 19,20 to predict the RUL have also achieved some success. However, traditional machine learning methods rely on complex feature engineering techniques, with limited deep-seated data mining features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%