2004
DOI: 10.1080/02732170490431340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status Divisions and Worker Mobilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to claims found in the literatures on homophily and class formation, the diversity of the living wage campaign was not an obstacle to be overcome but was – when experienced in the context of events that disrupted the rhythms of daily life – a source of the very kind of solidarity it is assumed to preclude. Our results thus support the small but growing body of research which suggests that diversity does not necessarily preclude solidarity: whether it becomes an impediment to collective action, as conventional accounts maintain, or instead fuels more expansive forms of identity and solidarity, as in Chicago, depends less on the existence of difference per se than on how those differences come to be understood in the course of social struggle (Bernstein ; Bickford ; Dixon ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Contrary to claims found in the literatures on homophily and class formation, the diversity of the living wage campaign was not an obstacle to be overcome but was – when experienced in the context of events that disrupted the rhythms of daily life – a source of the very kind of solidarity it is assumed to preclude. Our results thus support the small but growing body of research which suggests that diversity does not necessarily preclude solidarity: whether it becomes an impediment to collective action, as conventional accounts maintain, or instead fuels more expansive forms of identity and solidarity, as in Chicago, depends less on the existence of difference per se than on how those differences come to be understood in the course of social struggle (Bernstein ; Bickford ; Dixon ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…On the contrary, the regular workers union's indifference, and particularly, interference, has a negative impact on the outcomes of the latter group's struggle. This finding reaffirms that status division among regular and nonregular workers does preclude their joint/solidarity protest action, as indicated by Dixon (2004). At the same time, since non-regular workers unions lack their own resources to mobilize for protest action against employers' oppression, their struggle is heavily influenced by the regular workers unions' attitudes.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%