2004
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2004)152[0104:sofiny]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of Fishes in New York: Increases, Declines and Homogenization of Watersheds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As there was little variability in the distances between all Fish community structure the other basins, any analysis involving distances would result in the streams on basin 1 having a high leverage value, potentially leading to spurious results. Besides, stronger differences in basin 1 may have also been due to the fact that this was the only basin that drains into the Purus River (the others drain into the Madeira River), a result in accordance with other studies, which have also found differences in ichthyofauna composition between basins that drain into different large rivers (Matthews and Robison, 1988;Carlson and Daniels, 2004;Mendonça et al, 2005;Ingenito and Buckup, 2007). As basin 1 was different both in terms of distance and drainage direction, and there was no replicates for these differences, it was not possible also to analyze the relative effects of distance and drainage direction on composition, and to assess what of these factors would be responsible for the greater differentiation of the basin 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As there was little variability in the distances between all Fish community structure the other basins, any analysis involving distances would result in the streams on basin 1 having a high leverage value, potentially leading to spurious results. Besides, stronger differences in basin 1 may have also been due to the fact that this was the only basin that drains into the Purus River (the others drain into the Madeira River), a result in accordance with other studies, which have also found differences in ichthyofauna composition between basins that drain into different large rivers (Matthews and Robison, 1988;Carlson and Daniels, 2004;Mendonça et al, 2005;Ingenito and Buckup, 2007). As basin 1 was different both in terms of distance and drainage direction, and there was no replicates for these differences, it was not possible also to analyze the relative effects of distance and drainage direction on composition, and to assess what of these factors would be responsible for the greater differentiation of the basin 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, Matthews and Robison (1988) found significant differences in ichthyofauna composition between basins of major rivers in Arkansas. In New York, Carlson and Daniels (2004) observed significant differences in fish species richness and composition between 19 basins that are part of seven drainage systems in the region. Ingenito and Buckup (2007) reported significant differences in ichthyofauna between the Parnaíba do Sul and Sapucaí basins, but little differentiation within these basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the species not reported in 1937 may have gained access to the system by migration from downstream sites in recent decades or may have been overlooked in the original survey (Daniels et al 2006). Only seven were introduced exotic species, which is low when compared to other New York watersheds (Carlson and Daniels 2004 Ten species were reported from this basin for the first time (Daniels et al 2006). These include three introduced exotic species and seven species that immigrated into the basin recently or were previously overlooked or misidentified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The canal is also a vector for invasive species in many watersheds from Buffalo to Albany across NYS (Carlson and Daniels 2004), including the JCW where canal water enters from discharge valves and the lower TCW that is connected directly to the canal. Despite the high density of lowhead dams in the TCW (109) compared to that of the JCW (18), disturbance to the natural flow regime may be greater in the main channel of the JCW because of the Lyndonville Dam near rkm 18 that creates an expansive impoundment and impedes fish migration from Lake Ontario.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ono et al (1983) remarked that every species may be necessary to keep an ecosystem intact. Notable declines of many native stream fishes in New York State (Carlson and Daniels, 2004;Carlson, 2005;Wells and Haynes, 2006) have increased awareness of the need to pursue conservation for lesser known or imperiled fishes. The conservation of stream fishes is an evolving science and requires assessment of entire fish assemblages on differ-ent spatial scales.…”
Section: Research and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%