Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
As conventional petroleum is approaching its maximum production and the world oil demand continues to grow, heavy oil becomes one of the obvious replacement resources. One of the most important problems in heavy oil recovery is dramatic loss of wells' productivity at the onset of water inflow due to the two fluids' mobility contrast. Not only the recovery at breakthrough time is very low, but also the water cut increase is extremely rapid. The paper presents a worldwide survey of heavy oil reservoirs with water problems and their production methods including the in-situ water drainage with down-hole water sink (DWS) completion. It also investigates the mechanisms of productivity reduction and loss of recovery in wells producing heavy oil with bottom water drive. In the study, the production system (nodal) analysis model simulates well's inflow performance relationship (IPR) with variable water cut. The results capture the difference between heavy and light oil in terms of mobility ratio effect, recovery dynamics prior to and after water breakthrough, and water cut control with production rate. The IPR performance of water drainage with DWS wells is also presented and discussed.
As conventional petroleum is approaching its maximum production and the world oil demand continues to grow, heavy oil becomes one of the obvious replacement resources. One of the most important problems in heavy oil recovery is dramatic loss of wells' productivity at the onset of water inflow due to the two fluids' mobility contrast. Not only the recovery at breakthrough time is very low, but also the water cut increase is extremely rapid. The paper presents a worldwide survey of heavy oil reservoirs with water problems and their production methods including the in-situ water drainage with down-hole water sink (DWS) completion. It also investigates the mechanisms of productivity reduction and loss of recovery in wells producing heavy oil with bottom water drive. In the study, the production system (nodal) analysis model simulates well's inflow performance relationship (IPR) with variable water cut. The results capture the difference between heavy and light oil in terms of mobility ratio effect, recovery dynamics prior to and after water breakthrough, and water cut control with production rate. The IPR performance of water drainage with DWS wells is also presented and discussed.
Parejas, Ronal de la Cruz; Moura, Francisco José (Advisor). Effects of nanoparticles, Al 2 O 3 -NiO, TiO 2 e (Mg,Ni)O, on viscosity of heavy oil during aquathermolysis. Rio de Janeiro, 2014. 133p. MSc. Dissertation -The global demand in energy will increase by 50% over the next 20 years and oil will remain the main source of energy. Among the different types of crude oils, attention has been focused on the recovery of heavy and extra heavy oils, because the conventional resources as light and medium oils are globally decreasing. Heavy and extra heavy oils constitute 70% of world reserves, but lead to problems due to their high viscosity and complex composition.Therefore, the recovery of these oils represents a challenge for the oil industry.Conventional methods recover about 30% of oil in the reservoir and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) allows to get higher values. The most used method is the injection of steam whose main mechanism of this process is the heating of oil.Consequently there is a reduction of viscosity followed by an incipient cracking, phenomenon affected by the presence of steam water, which needs further studies. This work presents a study of the influence of nanoparticles in the steam injection (aquathermolysis), which can generate a catalytic effect; it enhances the incipient cracking and decreases the viscosity. A heavy oil with viscosity of 4730 cP at 25 °C was used in bench scale to evaluate the effects of time, temperature, type and concentration of nanoparticles (Al 2 O 3 -NiO, TiO 2 and (Mg,Ni)O) on viscosity and composition of the crude oil. The results showed that the presence of TiO 2 nanoparticles with steam water may improve the oil quality, by reducing the heavy fractions, and reducing its viscosity up to 13.4%.The technique was improved with increasing either temperature or time of aquathermolysis.
The article contains sections titled: 1. Introduction 2. Definitions 3. Chemistry 4. Viscous Oil Origins, Geological Setting and Resource Base Estimates 4.1. Viscous Oil Origins 4.2. Geographical Distribution and Resource Base Estimates 4.3. Canadian Oil Sands Deposits 4.3.1. The Athabasca Oil Sands 4.3.2. The Cold Lake Oil Sands 4.3.3. The Peace River Viscous Oil Sands 4.3.4. The Wabiskaw Viscous Oil Sands 4.3.5. The Heavy Oil Belt 4.3.6. Venezuelan Viscous Oil Deposits 4.4. Other Major Viscous Oil Deposits 4.4.1. Russia 4.4.2. Kazakhstan 4.4.3. Kuwait 4.4.4. China 4.4.5. Iran 5. In situ Production Technologies 5.1. Historical Development 5.2. Surface Mining 5.3. New Oil Production Technologies 5.3.1. Technical Screening Criteria for VO Production 5.3.2. VO Production Cost Estimates 5.3.3. Nonthermal Commercialized Methods 5.3.3.1. Cold Production 5.3.3.2. Cold Heavy Oil Production With Sand 5.3.3.3. Pressure Pulse Stimulation Technology 5.3.4. Commercialized Thermal Methods 5.3.4.1. In Situ Combustion 5.3.4.2. Conventional Steam Processes 5.3.4.3. Vertical Well Cyclic Steam Stimulation 5.3.4.4. Horizontal Well Cyclic Steam Stimulation 5.3.4.5. Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage 5.3.5. Emerging Methods 5.3.5.1. Vapor‐Assisted Petroleum Production 5.3.5.2. Toe‐to‐Heel‐Air Injection 5.3.5.3. CAPRI 5.3.5.4. Deep Miscible CO 2 Injection 5.3.6. Hybrid Approaches and Sequencing of Technologies 5.3.7. Geomechanics of Thermal VO Production 5.3.8. Steam Generation 5.3.9. Further Technical Issues 6. Upgrading and Transportation 6.1. Noncatalytic Processes in VO Upgrading 6.1.1. Solvent Deasphaltening 6.1.2. Thermal Conversion 6.1.2.1. Gasification 6.1.2.2. Delayed Coking 6.1.2.3. Fluid Coking and Flexicoking 6.1.2.4. Visbreaking 6.2. Catalytic Processes in VO Upgrading 6.2.1. Fluid Catalytic Cracking 6.2.2. Hydroprocessing/Hydrogenation 6.3. Hydrogen Sources 6.4. Coke 6.5. Sulfur Removal 6.6. Future Developments in Upgrading 6.7. Viscous Oil Transportation 7. Environmental Issues 7.1. Surface Mining Solid Wastes 7.2. Surface Mining Liquid Wastes and Sludges 7.3. In Situ Viscous Oil Recovery Processes 7.4. Sulfur and Coke 7.5. General Waste Management Options 7.6. Zero Emissions Targets 7.7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 7.8. Water Issues
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.