1999
DOI: 10.2307/3802632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of the Interior Population of Least Tern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This database will be designed to improve long-term data storage for future ILT survey data, and will also be designed to archive historic survey data (Lott 2006 For the Missouri River (all river and reservoir survey segments), historic data were acquired from the threatened and endangered species data management system (DMS) at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District. Count totals for many of these survey segments have been reported previously in Schwalbach (1988), Dirks (1990), Kruse (1993), Mayer (1993), Rabenberg et al (1993), Kirsch and Sidle (1999), Pavelka and Kruse (1999), USFWS (2003), USFWS (2005a), and probably elsewhere. However, the Omaha DMS has consolidated previous historic survey data into well-defined, geographically meaningful survey segments that have been described in the most recent amendment to the Missouri River Biological Opinion (USFWS 2003); correcting errors in several previous data presentations (Greg Pavelka, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, personal communication).…”
Section: Historic Data Summaries: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This database will be designed to improve long-term data storage for future ILT survey data, and will also be designed to archive historic survey data (Lott 2006 For the Missouri River (all river and reservoir survey segments), historic data were acquired from the threatened and endangered species data management system (DMS) at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District. Count totals for many of these survey segments have been reported previously in Schwalbach (1988), Dirks (1990), Kruse (1993), Mayer (1993), Rabenberg et al (1993), Kirsch and Sidle (1999), Pavelka and Kruse (1999), USFWS (2003), USFWS (2005a), and probably elsewhere. However, the Omaha DMS has consolidated previous historic survey data into well-defined, geographically meaningful survey segments that have been described in the most recent amendment to the Missouri River Biological Opinion (USFWS 2003); correcting errors in several previous data presentations (Greg Pavelka, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, personal communication).…”
Section: Historic Data Summaries: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Collaborative efforts are ongoing to discuss and resolve discrepancies among historic data within the Platte River system (Renae Held, Tern and Plover Partnership, personal communication). Hopefully, these efforts will reconcile the many different versions of historic data for the Platte River system that have been presented in Sidle et al (1991), Dinan et al (1993), Sidle and Kirsch (1993), Kirsch (1996), Kirsch and Sidle (1999), Kirsch (2000), Boyce et al (2002) The small percentage of birds breeding on riverine sandbars of the "Lower" Platte River in 2005 is anomalous. Typically, about 58 percent of ILT nest on river sandbars on the "Lower" Platte, whereas only 53 of 381 birds (14 percent) were nesting on the river in 2005 (Appendix C).…”
Section: Historic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations